Mackinnon A J, Henderson A S, Scott R, Duncan-Jones P
NH & MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Australian National University, Canberra.
Psychol Med. 1989 Nov;19(4):1023-34. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700005754.
The Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) was used in a 2-wave community survey of 386 persons. The two factor structure of the instrument was confirmed, as well as the high stability of its scales over time. Respondents who had had children differed significantly from others. No association was found between social desirability, neuroticism or extraversion and either of the scales. No association was observed between the scales and psychiatric disorder, despite using covariance structure analysis to remove the effects of age and attenuation due to measurement error. Estimates of relative risk for affectionless control were low in contrast to estimates calculated from samples with psychiatric disorders. These findings may be characteristic of symptomatic persons in a general population. Because of the importance of the affectionless control construct, the findings invite further investigation in other community and treated samples.
父母教养方式问卷（PBI）被用于一项针对386人的两阶段社区调查。该问卷的双因素结构得到了确认，其各分量表在不同时间的稳定性也很高。有孩子的受访者与其他人有显著差异。未发现社会期望、神经质或外向性与任何一个分量表之间存在关联。尽管使用协方差结构分析来消除年龄影响和测量误差导致的衰减，但未观察到各分量表与精神障碍之间存在关联。与从患有精神障碍的样本中计算出的估计值相比，情感缺失型控制的相对风险估计值较低。这些发现可能是普通人群中有症状者的特征。由于情感缺失型控制结构的重要性，这些发现值得在其他社区样本和接受治疗的样本中进一步研究。
