Virk Selene M, Gibson Richard M, Quinones-Mateu Miguel E, Barnholtz-Sloan Jill S
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
University Hospital Translational Laboratory, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
PLoS One. 2015 May 7;10(5):e0124178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124178. eCollection 2015.
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive, malignant brain tumor typically resulting in death of the patient within one year following diagnosis; and those who survive beyond this point usually present with tumor recurrence within two years (5-year survival is 5%). The genetic heterogeneity of GBM has made the molecular characterization of these tumors an area of great interest and has led to identification of molecular subtypes in GBM. The availability of sequencing platforms that are both fast and economical can further the adoption of tumor sequencing in the clinical environment, potentially leading to identification of clinically actionable genetic targets. In this pilot study, comprised of triplet samples of normal blood, primary tumor, and recurrent tumor samples from three patients; we compared the ability of Illumina whole exome sequencing (ExomeSeq) and the Ion AmpliSeq Comprehensive Cancer Panel (CCP) to identify somatic variants in patient-paired primary and recurrent tumor samples. Thirteen genes were found to harbor variants, the majority of which were exclusive to the ExomeSeq data. Surprisingly, only two variants were identified by both platforms and they were located within the PTCH1 and NF1 genes. Although preliminary in nature, this work highlights major differences in variant identification in data generated from the two platforms. Additional studies with larger samples sizes are needed to further explore the differences between these technologies and to enhance our understanding of the clinical utility of panel based platforms in genomic profiling of brain tumors.
胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)是一种侵袭性恶性脑肿瘤,通常在诊断后一年内导致患者死亡;而那些存活超过这一时期的患者通常会在两年内出现肿瘤复发(5年生存率为5%)。GBM的基因异质性使得这些肿瘤的分子特征成为一个备受关注的领域,并导致了GBM分子亚型的鉴定。快速且经济的测序平台的可用性可以推动肿瘤测序在临床环境中的应用,有可能导致鉴定出具有临床可操作性的基因靶点。在这项试点研究中,我们使用了来自三名患者的正常血液、原发性肿瘤和复发性肿瘤样本的三联体样本;比较了Illumina全外显子测序(ExomeSeq)和Ion AmpliSeq综合癌症检测板(CCP)在患者配对的原发性和复发性肿瘤样本中鉴定体细胞变异的能力。发现有13个基因存在变异,其中大多数变异仅在ExomeSeq数据中出现。令人惊讶的是,两个平台仅鉴定出两个变异,且它们位于PTCH1和NF1基因内。尽管这项工作本质上是初步的,但它突出了两个平台生成的数据在变异鉴定方面的主要差异。需要进行更多样本量更大的研究,以进一步探索这些技术之间的差异,并增强我们对基于检测板的平台在脑肿瘤基因组分析中的临床实用性的理解。