Center for Translational Lung Biology, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Center for Translational Lung Biology, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Chest. 2015 Oct;148(4):1073-1082. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0076.
A central tenet of caring for patients with ARDS is to treat the underlying cause, be it sepsis, pneumonia, or removal of an offending toxin. Identifying the risk factor for ARDS has even been proposed as essential to diagnosing ARDS. Not infrequently, however, the precipitant for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is unclear, and this raises the question of whether a histologic lung diagnosis would benefit the patient. In this review, we consider the historic role of pathology in establishing a diagnosis of ARDS and the published experience of surgical and transbronchial lung biopsy in patients with ARDS. We reflect on which pathologic diagnoses influence treatment and suggest a patient-centric approach to weigh the risks and benefits of a lung biopsy for critically ill patients who may have ARDS.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者治疗的一个中心原则是治疗潜在病因,无论是脓毒症、肺炎,还是去除致病毒物。甚至有人提出,确定 ARDS 的危险因素对于 ARDS 的诊断至关重要。然而,急性低氧性呼吸衰竭的诱因并不总是明确的,这就提出了一个问题,即组织学肺部诊断是否对患者有益。在这篇综述中,我们考虑了病理学在确立 ARDS 诊断中的历史作用,以及发表的外科和经支气管肺活检在 ARDS 患者中的经验。我们反思了哪些病理诊断会影响治疗,并提出了一种以患者为中心的方法,权衡对可能患有 ARDS 的危重症患者进行肺活检的风险和获益。