• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Caring for quality of care: symbolic violence and the bureaucracies of audit.关注医疗质量:象征性暴力与审计官僚机构
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 May 8;16:23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0006-z.
2
The changing landscape of care: does ethics education have a new role to play in health practice?不断变化的护理格局:伦理教育在医疗实践中是否有新的作用?
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 May 8;16:22. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0005-0.
3
Fake kindness, caring and symbolic violence.虚假的友善、关心和象征性暴力。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Sep;31(6):1041-1049. doi: 10.1177/09697330231209290. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
4
What does 'quality' add? Towards an ethics of healthcare improvement.“质量”有何增益?走向医疗保健改进的伦理之路。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Feb;46(2):118-122. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105635. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
5
It is not enough to grieve; we must learn from Gorakhpur.仅仅悲伤是不够的;我们必须从戈勒克布尔汲取教训。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2017 Oct-Dec;2(4):221-223. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2017.080.
6
Knowing-how to care.知道如何护理。
J Med Ethics. 2016 Jul;42(7):474-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103226. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
7
Utilizing the moral nobility of older Chinese women in governance: The uses of humility, empathy, and an ethics of care in moral clinics in Huzhou city.利用年长中国女性在治理中的道德高尚品质:湖州市道德诊所中谦逊、同理心和关爱伦理的应用。
Br J Sociol. 2020 Mar;71(2):300-313. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12736. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
8
Marginalization and symbolic violence in a world of differences: war and parallels to nursing practice.差异世界中的边缘化与象征性暴力:战争及与护理实践的相似之处
Nurs Philos. 2004 Apr;5(1):41-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2004.00165.x.
9
Moral Distress and Austerity: An Avoidable Ethical Challenge in Healthcare.道德困境与紧缩政策:医疗保健中的一个可避免的伦理挑战。
Health Care Anal. 2019 Sep;27(3):185-201. doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00376-8.
10
Evil, Child Abuse and the Caring Professions.《邪恶、虐待儿童与关爱职业》
J Relig Health. 2015 Oct;54(5):1660-71. doi: 10.1007/s10943-014-9898-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Practices and Perceptions of Community Health Centres Professionals Toward Evaluation: A Qualitative Study.社区卫生中心专业人员对评估的实践与认知:一项定性研究
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70179. doi: 10.1111/jep.70179.
2
"Violence" in medicine: necessary and unnecessary, intentional and unintentional.医学中的“暴力”:必要与不必要的,有意与无意的。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2018 Jun 11;13(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13010-018-0059-y.
3
Confronting the quality paradox: towards new characterisations of 'quality' in contemporary healthcare.直面质量悖论:探寻当代医疗保健中“质量”的新特征
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun 19;15:240. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0851-y.
4
Caring for the patient, caring for the record: an ethnographic study of 'back office' work in upholding quality of care in general practice.关爱患者,关注记录:一项关于基层医疗中维护医疗质量的“后台”工作的人种志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 23;15:177. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0774-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Displays of authority in the clinical consultation: a linguistic ethnographic study of the electronic patient record.临床会诊中的权威展示:电子病历的语言民族志研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Oct;118:17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.045. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
2
Ethics and end of life care: the Liverpool Care Pathway and the Neuberger Review.伦理与临终关怀:利物浦临终关怀路径及纽伯格报告
J Med Ethics. 2015 Aug;41(8):639-43. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101780. Epub 2014 May 21.
3
Rethinking 'quality' in health care.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014 Apr;19(2):65-6. doi: 10.1177/1355819613518522. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
4
Computer templates in chronic disease management: ethnographic case study in general practice.慢性病管理中的计算机模板:普通实践中的民族志案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2012 Nov 28;2(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001754. Print 2012.
5
Defining "quality of care" persuasively.有说服力地定义“护理质量”。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2012 Aug;33(4):243-61. doi: 10.1007/s11017-012-9230-4.
6
Quality of care: a preface.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2012 Aug;33(4):237-42. doi: 10.1007/s11017-012-9225-1.
7
Measuring quality in the therapeutic relationship--part 2: subjective approaches.衡量治疗关系中的质量——第2部分:主观方法。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):479-83. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2010.043372.
8
Measuring quality in the therapeutic relationship--part 1: objective approaches.衡量治疗关系中的质量——第1部分:客观方法。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):475-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2010.043364.
9
Three versions of an ethics of care.关怀伦理学的三个版本。
Nurs Philos. 2009 Oct;10(4):231-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2009.00415.x.

关注医疗质量:象征性暴力与审计官僚机构

Caring for quality of care: symbolic violence and the bureaucracies of audit.

作者信息

Emmerich Nathan, Swinglehurst Deborah, Maybin Jo, Park Sophie, Quilligan Sally

机构信息

School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2015 May 8;16:23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0006-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-015-0006-z
PMID:25952931
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4493962/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This article considers the moral notion of care in the context of Quality of Care discourses. Whilst care has clear normative implications for the delivery of health care it is less clear how Quality of Care, something that is centrally involved in the governance of UK health care, relates to practice.

DISCUSSION

This paper presents a social and ethical analysis of Quality of Care in the light of the moral notion of care and Bourdieu's conception of symbolic violence. We argue that Quality of Care bureaucracies show significant potential for symbolic violence or the domination of practice and health care professionals. This generates problematic, and unintended, consequences that can displace the goals of practice.

SUMMARY

Quality of Care bureaucracies may have unintended consequences for the practice of health care. Consistent with feminist conceptions of care, Quality of Care 'audits' should be reconfigured so as to offer a more nuanced and responsive form of evaluation.

摘要

背景

本文在医疗质量话语的背景下探讨关怀的道德观念。虽然关怀对于医疗服务的提供具有明确的规范意义,但不太明确的是,作为英国医疗治理核心内容的医疗质量与实践是如何关联的。

讨论

本文根据关怀的道德观念和布迪厄的象征性暴力概念,对医疗质量进行了社会和伦理分析。我们认为,医疗质量官僚机构具有实施象征性暴力或支配实践及医疗专业人员的巨大潜力。这会产生有问题的、意想不到的后果,可能会偏离实践目标。

总结

医疗质量官僚机构可能会给医疗实践带来意想不到的后果。与女性主义关怀观念一致,应重新构建医疗质量“审计”,以提供一种更细致入微、更具响应性的评估形式。