• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适用于公共资助的全民医疗保健系统的医疗保健可负担性衡量标准的制定。

Development of a measure of health care affordability applicable in a publicly funded universal health care system.

作者信息

Haggerty Jeannie L, Levesque Jean-Frédéric

机构信息

McGill University.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2015 Feb 4;106(2):e66-71. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4562.

DOI:10.17269/cjph.106.4562
PMID:25955674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6972124/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Direct measures of health care affordability from the user perspective are needed to monitor equitable access to publicly funded health care in Canada. The objective of our study was to develop a survey-based measure of healthcare affordability applicable to the Canadian context.

METHODS

We developed items after focus group exploration of access and cost barriers in the healthcare trajectory. We administered an initial instrument by telephone to a randomly-selected sample of 750 respondents in metropolitan, rural, and remote settings in Quebec. After analysis we developed a new, self-administered version eliciting the frequency of problem access due to five affordability dimensions. This version was mailed to a subset of participants. We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. We used ordinal logistic regression modelling to examine how individual items and the subscale score predicted indicators of difficult access. We looked for effect modification by income categories.

RESULTS

The five items load on a single construct with good internal consistency (α = 0.77). The overall score, 0 to 5, reflects the sum of problems with healthcare affordability due to direct and indirect costs. The item and subscale scores are sensitive to income status, with affordability problems more prevalent among low-income than high-income respondents. Each unit increase in the subscale score predicts increased likelihood of unmet needs (OR = 1.54), emergency room use (OR = 1.41), and health problem aggravation (OR = 1.80).

DISCUSSION

This subscale reliably and validly measures cost barriers to medically necessary services in Canada, and can potentially be applied in other settings with publicly funded health systems. It can be used to monitor and compare healthcare equity.

摘要

目的

需要从用户角度对医疗保健可负担性进行直接测量,以监测加拿大公共资助医疗保健的公平可及性。我们研究的目的是开发一种适用于加拿大情况的基于调查的医疗保健可负担性测量方法。

方法

在对医疗保健过程中的可及性和成本障碍进行焦点小组探讨后,我们制定了相关条目。我们通过电话对魁北克省大城市、农村和偏远地区随机抽取的750名受访者样本进行了初步调查。经过分析,我们开发了一个新的自填式版本,该版本引出了由于五个可负担性维度导致的问题可及性的频率。这个版本被邮寄给了一部分参与者。我们进行了探索性和验证性因素分析。我们使用有序逻辑回归模型来检验各个条目和子量表得分如何预测难以获得医疗服务的指标。我们研究了收入类别对结果的影响。

结果

这五个条目加载在一个单一结构上,具有良好的内部一致性(α = 0.77)。总体得分从0到5,反映了由于直接和间接成本导致的医疗保健可负担性问题的总和。条目和子量表得分对收入状况敏感,低收入受访者比高收入受访者更容易出现可负担性问题。子量表得分每增加一个单位,预测未满足需求的可能性增加(OR = 1.54)、急诊室使用的可能性增加(OR = 1.41)以及健康问题恶化的可能性增加(OR = 1.80)。

讨论

这个子量表可靠且有效地测量了加拿大医疗必需服务的成本障碍,并且有可能应用于其他有公共资助卫生系统的环境中。它可用于监测和比较医疗保健公平性。

相似文献

1
Development of a measure of health care affordability applicable in a publicly funded universal health care system.适用于公共资助的全民医疗保健系统的医疗保健可负担性衡量标准的制定。
Can J Public Health. 2015 Feb 4;106(2):e66-71. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4562.
2
Validation of a new measure of availability and accommodation of health care that is valid for rural and urban contexts.一种适用于农村和城市环境的医疗保健可及性与适应性新测量方法的验证。
Health Expect. 2017 Apr;20(2):321-334. doi: 10.1111/hex.12461. Epub 2016 May 18.
3
Patterns of patient experience with primary care access in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Switzerland: a comparative study.澳大利亚、加拿大、新西兰和瑞士的初级保健获取患者体验模式:一项比较研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Nov 30;31(9):G126-G132. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz092.
4
Eye care utilization in Canada: disparity in the publicly funded health care system.加拿大的眼科保健利用情况:公共资助的医疗保健系统中的差异。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2011 Apr;46(2):133-8. doi: 10.3129/i10-120.
5
Estimating benefit equity of government health subsidy in healthcare Services in Shandong Province, China: a cross-sectional study.评估中国山东省医疗服务中政府卫生补贴的效益公平性:一项横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 May 18;17(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0775-3.
6
Income-Related Inequality In Affordability And Access To Primary Care In Eleven High-Income Countries.11 个高收入国家初级保健的可负担性和可及性的收入相关不平等。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Jan;40(1):113-120. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01566. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
7
Disparities in access to physicians and medications for the treatment of substance use disorders between publicly and privately funded treatment programs in the United States.美国公共和私人资助的治疗项目在获得治疗物质使用障碍的医生和药物方面的差异。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2013 Mar;74(2):258-65. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2013.74.258.
8
Inequity in healthcare needs, health service use and financial burden of medical expenditures in China: results from a consecutive household monitoring study in Jiangsu Province.中国医疗保健需求、卫生服务利用和医疗支出经济负担的不公平性:来自江苏省连续家庭监测研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 16;19(1):966. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4796-4.
9
Access to care, health status, and health disparities in the United States and Canada: results of a cross-national population-based survey.美国和加拿大的医疗服务可及性、健康状况及健康差距:一项基于全国人口调查的结果
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jul;96(7):1300-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.059402. Epub 2006 May 30.
10
Inequalities in medicine use in Central Eastern Europe: an empirical investigation of socioeconomic determinants in eight countries.中东欧地区药物使用的不平等现象:对八个国家社会经济决定因素的实证研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Nov 5;14:124. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0261-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Affordability of health services and associated factors among patients with diabetes mellitus under regular follow-up at Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚东北部德西综合专科医院定期随访的糖尿病患者的医疗服务负担能力及其影响因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):1444. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11846-8.
2
Expanding a Behavioral View on Digital Health Access: Drivers and Strategies to Promote Equity.拓展数字健康获取的行为视角:促进公平的驱动因素与策略
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 1;26:e51355. doi: 10.2196/51355.
3
Evaluation of the implementation of single points of access for unattached patients in primary care and their effects: a study protocol.评价初级保健中未附属于任何医疗机构的患者的单点接入实施情况及其效果的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 3;13(3):e070956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070956.
4
Content Validity of a Scale Designed to Measure the Access of Older Adults to Outpatient Health Services.用于测量老年人获得门诊卫生服务机会的量表的内容效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;19(16):10102. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610102.
5
Assessing healthcare access using the Levesque's conceptual framework- a scoping review.使用 Levesque 的概念框架评估医疗保健可及性 - 范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 May 7;20(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01416-3.
6
Does healthcare inequity reflect variations in peoples' abilities to access healthcare? Results from a multi-jurisdictional interventional study in two high-income countries.卫生保健不公平是否反映了人们获得卫生保健能力的差异?来自两个高收入国家的多司法管辖区干预性研究的结果。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 25;19(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01281-6.
7
Validation of a new measure of availability and accommodation of health care that is valid for rural and urban contexts.一种适用于农村和城市环境的医疗保健可及性与适应性新测量方法的验证。
Health Expect. 2017 Apr;20(2):321-334. doi: 10.1111/hex.12461. Epub 2016 May 18.

本文引用的文献

1
An exploration of rural-urban differences in healthcare-seeking trajectories: implications for measures of accessibility.城乡就医轨迹差异探究:对可及性衡量指标的启示
Health Place. 2014 Jul;28:92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 May 3.
2
Differential item functioning in primary healthcare evaluation instruments by french/english version, educational level and urban/rural location.法语/英语版本、教育水平和城乡位置对初级医疗保健评估工具中项目功能差异的影响
Healthc Policy. 2011 Dec;7(Spec Issue):47-65.
3
Emerging organisational models of primary healthcare and unmet needs for care: insights from a population-based survey in Quebec province.初级医疗保健的新兴组织模式和未满足的护理需求:魁北克省基于人群调查的见解。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jul 2;13:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-66.
4
Universal health insurance and equity in primary care and specialist office visits: a population-based study.全民健康保险与初级保健和专科门诊的公平性:一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2009 Sep-Oct;7(5):396-405. doi: 10.1370/afm.994.
5
Does Equity in Healthcare Use Vary across Canadian Provinces?加拿大各省在医疗保健使用方面的公平性是否存在差异?
Healthc Policy. 2008 May;3(4):83-99.
6
Equity in health and health care in a decentralised context: evidence from Canada.分权背景下的健康与医疗保健公平性:来自加拿大的证据
Health Econ. 2008 Mar;17(3):377-92. doi: 10.1002/hec.1272.
7
Equity in health services use and intensity of use in Canada.加拿大医疗服务利用及利用强度方面的公平性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Mar 11;7:41. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-41.
8
Primary care and health system performance: adults' experiences in five countries.初级保健与卫生系统绩效:五个国家成年人的经历
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W4-487-503. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w4.487.
9
Inequities in access to medical care in five countries: findings from the 2001 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey.五个国家医疗服务可及性方面的不平等:2001年英联邦基金会国际卫生政策调查结果
Health Policy. 2004 Mar;67(3):309-22. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.09.006.
10
VA community-based outpatient clinics: performance measures based on patient perceptions of care.退伍军人事务部社区门诊诊所:基于患者护理感知的绩效指标
Med Care. 2002 Jul;40(7):578-86. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200207000-00004.