Imbir Kamil Konrad, Jarymowicz Maria Teresa, Spustek Tomasz, Kuś Rafał, Żygierewicz Jarosław
Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Warsaw, Poland.
Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
PLoS One. 2015 May 8;10(5):e0126129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126129. eCollection 2015.
We distinguish two evaluative systems which evoke automatic and reflective emotions. Automatic emotions are direct reactions to stimuli whereas reflective emotions are always based on verbalized (and often abstract) criteria of evaluation. We conducted an electroencephalography (EEG) study in which 25 women were required to read and respond to emotional words which engaged either the automatic or reflective system. Stimulus words were emotional (positive or negative) and neutral. We found an effect of valence on an early response with dipolar fronto-occipital topography; positive words evoked a higher amplitude response than negative words. We also found that topographically specific differences in the amplitude of the late positive complex were related to the system involved in processing. Emotional stimuli engaging the automatic system were associated with significantly higher amplitudes in the left-parietal region; the response to neutral words was similar regardless of the system engaged. A different pattern of effects was observed in the central region, neutral stimuli engaging the reflective system evoked a higher amplitudes response whereas there was no system effect for emotional stimuli. These differences could not be reduced to effects of differences between the arousing properties and concreteness of the words used as stimuli.
我们区分出两种引发自动情绪和反思情绪的评价系统。自动情绪是对刺激的直接反应,而反思情绪总是基于言语化(且通常是抽象的)评价标准。我们进行了一项脑电图(EEG)研究,要求25名女性阅读并对涉及自动或反思系统的情感词汇做出反应。刺激词汇包括情感类(积极或消极)和中性词汇。我们发现,在早期反应中,效价呈现出偶极额枕部地形图效应;积极词汇引发的反应幅度高于消极词汇。我们还发现,晚期正复合波的幅度在地形学上的特定差异与参与处理的系统有关。涉及自动系统的情感刺激在左顶叶区域的幅度显著更高;无论参与的是哪个系统,对中性词汇的反应都是相似的。在中央区域观察到了不同的效应模式,涉及反思系统的中性刺激引发了更高幅度的反应,而情感刺激则没有系统效应。这些差异不能归结为所用刺激词汇的唤起特性和具体性差异所产生的影响。