Suppr超能文献

SWAT-1:“实地考察”干预措施对多中心随机试验招募率的有效性。

SWAT-1: The effectiveness of a 'site visit' intervention on recruitment rates in a multi-centre randomised trial.

作者信息

Smith Valerie, Clarke Mike, Begley Cecily, Devane Declan

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, D'Olier Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Trials. 2015 May 10;16:211. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0732-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recruitment rates in multi-centre randomised trials often fall below target recruitment rates, causing problems for study outcomes. The Studies Within A Trial (SWAT) Programme, established by the All-Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research in collaboration with the Medical Research Council Network of Hubs in the United Kingdom and others, is developing methods for evaluating aspects of trial methodology through the conduct of research within research. A recently published design for a SWAT-1 provides a protocol for evaluating the effect of a site visit by the principal investigator on recruitment in multi-centre trials.

METHODS

Using the SWAT-1 design, the effect of a site visit, with the sole purpose of discussing trial recruitment, on recruitment rates in a large multicentre trial in the Republic of Ireland was evaluated. A controlled before and after intervention comparison was used, where the date of the site visit provides the time point for the intervention, and for the comparison to control sites. Site A received the intervention. Site B and Site C acted as the controls. Z-scores for proportions were calculated to determine within site recruitment differences. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to determine between site recruitment differences.

RESULTS

Recruitment rates were increased in Site A post-intervention (17% and 14% percentage point increases at 1 and 3 months, respectively). No differences in recruitment occurred in Site B or in Site C. Comparing between site differences, at 3 months post-intervention, a statistically significant difference was detected in favour of higher recruitment in Site A (34% versus 25%; odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 2.26).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first reported example of a study in the SWAT programme.. It provides evidence that a site visit, combined with a scheduled meeting, increases recruitment in a clinical trial. Using this example, other researchers might be encouraged to consider conducting a similar study, allowing the findings of future SWAT-1s to be compared and combined, so that higher level evidence on the effect of a site visit by the principal investigator can be obtained.

THE ADCAR TRIAL

ISRCTN-96340041 ( www.controlled-trials.com ); date of registration: 25 March 2008.

摘要

背景

多中心随机试验的招募率常常低于目标招募率,这给研究结果带来了问题。由全爱尔兰试验方法研究中心与英国医学研究理事会中心网络及其他机构合作设立的试验中的研究(SWAT)项目,正在开发通过开展研究中的研究来评估试验方法各方面的方法。最近发表的一项SWAT - 1设计提供了一个方案,用于评估主要研究者进行的现场考察对多中心试验招募情况的影响。

方法

采用SWAT - 1设计,评估了在爱尔兰共和国一项大型多中心试验中,仅以讨论试验招募为唯一目的的现场考察对招募率的影响。采用干预前后对照比较,现场考察日期作为干预时间点,并用于与对照站点进行比较。站点A接受干预,站点B和站点C作为对照。计算比例的Z分数以确定站点内的招募差异,计算优势比和95%置信区间以确定站点间的招募差异。

结果

干预后站点A的招募率有所提高(1个月和3个月时分别提高了17个和14个百分点)。站点B和站点C的招募情况没有差异。比较站点间差异,干预后3个月时,检测到有利于站点A更高招募率的统计学显著差异(34%对25%;优势比1.57,95%置信区间1.09至2.26)。

结论

这是SWAT项目中首次报道的一项研究实例。它提供了证据表明,现场考察与定期会议相结合可提高临床试验的招募率。以这个例子为参考,可能会鼓励其他研究人员考虑开展类似研究,以便能够比较和整合未来SWAT - 1的研究结果,从而获得关于主要研究者现场考察效果的更高级别证据。

ADCAR试验:ISRCTN - 96340041(www.controlled - trials.com);注册日期:2008年3月25日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3856/4429599/5a87419d1f56/13063_2015_732_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验