NPHIRU, LSHTM, London, UK.
Clin Trials. 2010 Jun;7(3):265-73. doi: 10.1177/1740774510367687.
Recruitment is a major challenge for trials but there is little evidence regarding interventions to increase trial recruitment. We report three controlled trials of interventions to increase recruitment to the Txt2stop trial.
To evaluate: Trial 1. The impact on registrations of a text message regarding an online registration facility; Trial 2. The impact on randomizations of sending pound5 with a covering letter to those eligible to join the trial; Trial 3. The impact on randomizations of text messages containing quotes from existing participants.
Single blind controlled trials with allocation concealment.
Trial 1: A text message regarding our new online registration facility; Trial 2: A letter with pound5 enclosed; Trial 3: A series of four text messages containing quotes from participants. The control group in each trial received standard Txt2stop procedures.
Trial 1: 3.6% (17/470) of the intervention group and 1.1% (5/467) of the control group registered for the trial, risk difference 2.5% (95% CI 0.6-4.5). 0% (0/ 470) of the intervention group and 0.2% (1/467) of the control group registered successfully online, risk difference -0.2 (95% CI -0.6-0.2); Trial 2: 4.5% (11/246) of the intervention group and 0.4% (1/245) of the control group were randomized into the Txt2stop trial, risk difference 4.0% (95% CI 1.4-6.7); Trial 3: 3.5% (14/405) of the intervention group and 0% (0/406) of the control group were randomized into the Txt2stop trial, risk difference 3.5 (95% CI 1.7-5.2).
There were no baseline data available for trial 1. Allocation of participant IDs in trials 2 and 3 were systematic.
Sending a text message about an online registration facility increased registrations to Txt2stop, but did not increase online registrations. Sending a pound5 reimbursement for participants' time and sending text messages containing quotes from existing participants increased randomizations into the Txt2stop trial. Clinical Trials 2010; 7: 265-273. http://ctj.sagepub.com.
招募是试验的主要挑战,但几乎没有证据表明干预措施可以增加试验招募。我们报告了三项旨在增加 Txt2stop 试验招募的干预措施的对照试验。
评估:试验 1. 关于在线注册设施的短信对注册的影响;试验 2. 随附附信的 5 英镑对符合条件的试验参与者的随机分配的影响;试验 3. 包含现有参与者引述的短信对随机分配的影响。
单盲对照试验,采用分配隐藏。
试验 1:关于我们新的在线注册设施的短信;试验 2:随附 5 英镑的信;试验 3:包含参与者引述的四条短信。每个试验的对照组均接受标准的 Txt2stop 程序。
试验 1:干预组的注册率为 3.6%(17/470),对照组为 1.1%(5/467),风险差异为 2.5%(95%CI 0.6-4.5)。干预组中没有成功在线注册的比例为 0%(0/470),对照组为 0.2%(1/467),风险差异为-0.2(95%CI -0.6-0.2);试验 2:干预组的随机分配率为 4.5%(11/246),对照组为 0.4%(1/245),风险差异为 4.0%(95%CI 1.4-6.7);试验 3:干预组的随机分配率为 3.5%(14/405),对照组为 0%(0/406),风险差异为 3.5(95%CI 1.7-5.2)。
试验 1 没有基线数据。试验 2 和 3 中参与者 ID 的分配是系统的。
发送有关在线注册设施的短信增加了 Txt2stop 的注册人数,但并没有增加在线注册人数。为参与者的时间支付 5 英镑的报销,并发送包含现有参与者引述的短信,增加了对 Txt2stop 试验的随机分配。临床试验 2010;7:265-273。http://ctj.sagepub.com。