College of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
College of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Tropical Agricultural Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Sep 15;527-528:126-34. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.117. Epub 2015 May 14.
The behavior of veterinary antibiotics in the soil is commonly studied using the following methods to add antibiotics to the soil: (A) adding manure collected from animals fed a diet that includes antibiotics; (B) adding antibiotic-free animal manure spiked with antibiotics; and (C) the direct addition of antibiotics. However, most studies have only used methods (B) and (C) in their research, and few studies have simultaneously compared the different antibiotic addition methods. This study used tylosin A (TYLA) as a model antibiotic to compare the effects of these three commonly used antibiotic addition methods on the dissipation rates of TYLA and the numbers of resistance genes in laboratory incubation experiments. The results showed that the three treatment methods produced similar TYLA degradation trends; however, there were significant differences (P<0.05) in the TYLA degradation half-life (t1/2) among the three methods. The half-life of TYLA degradation in treatments A, B and C was 2.44 ± 0.04, 1.21 ± 0.03 and 5.13 ± 0.11 days, respectively. The presence of manure resulted in a higher electrical conductivity (EC), higher relative abundance of Citrobacter amalonaticus, higher macrolide resistant gene (ermB, ermF and ermT) count and lower ecological toxicity in the soil, which could partially explain the higher TYLA degradation rate in the treatments containing manure. The higher degradation rate of TYLA in treatment B when compared to treatment A could be due to the lower concentrations of tylosin B (TYLB) and tylosin D (TYLD). The main route for veterinary antibiotics to enter the soil is via the manure of animals that have been administered antibiotics. Therefore, the more appropriate method to study the degradation and ecotoxicity of antibiotic residues in the soil is by using manure from animals fed/administered the particular antibiotic rather than by adding the antibiotic directly to the soil.
(A)添加来自用含抗生素饲料喂养的动物的粪便;(B)添加不含抗生素但添加了抗生素的动物粪便;和(C)直接添加抗生素。然而,大多数研究仅在其研究中使用方法(B)和(C),很少有研究同时比较不同的抗生素添加方法。本研究以泰乐菌素 A(TYLA)为模型抗生素,比较了这三种常用抗生素添加方法对 TYLA 消解率和实验室培养实验中抗性基因数量的影响。结果表明,三种处理方法产生了相似的 TYLA 降解趋势;然而,三种方法之间 TYLA 降解半衰期(t1/2)存在显著差异(P<0.05)。处理 A、B 和 C 中 TYLA 降解的半衰期分别为 2.44±0.04、1.21±0.03 和 5.13±0.11 天。粪便的存在导致土壤电导率(EC)更高、柠檬酸杆菌相对丰度更高、大环内酯类抗性基因(ermB、ermF 和 ermT)计数更高,生态毒性更低,这可以部分解释粪便处理中 TYLA 降解率更高的原因。与处理 A 相比,处理 B 中 TYLA 的降解率更高,可能是因为泰乐菌素 B(TYLB)和泰乐菌素 D(TYLD)的浓度较低。兽医抗生素进入土壤的主要途径是通过用抗生素处理的动物的粪便。因此,研究土壤中抗生素残留的降解和生态毒性更合适的方法是使用用特定抗生素喂养/处理的动物的粪便,而不是直接将抗生素添加到土壤中。