Gelder Brooke M, Loughland Carmel M, Carr Vaughan J, Schofield Peter W
1School of Psychology,University of Newcastle,Newcastle,NSW,Australia.
2Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health,Hunter New England Mental Health,University of Newcastle,Newcastle,NSW,Australia.
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2015 Oct;27(5):279-90. doi: 10.1017/neu.2015.19. Epub 2015 May 11.
This study investigated the ability of the Audio Recorded Cognitive Screen (ARCS) to detect cognitive deficit in individuals with schizophrenia, relative to the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), and explored the associations between the ARCS and functional outcomes. We hypothesised that the ARCS would be able to better discriminate between individuals with schizophrenia and healthy controls than the MMSE, and that ARCS performance would be correlated with measures of social and vocational functioning.
The participants were 19 community-dwelling individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 19 healthy controls recruited from the Australian Schizophrenia Research Bank (ASRB). Participants completed the ARCS, MMSE, and self-report measures of social and vocational functioning. Clinical and diagnostic data stored by the ASRB were also utilised.
The schizophrenia group performed worse than the control group on the ARCS, with memory, t(36)=2.49, p=0.02, 95% CI [-1.84, -18.79] and fluency, t(36)=2.40, p=0.02, 95% CI [-1.87, -22.24] domains being the main discriminating measures. The RBANS also discriminated between the two groups, and ARCS and RBANS total scores were moderately to strongly correlated. There was no difference between the two groups on the MMSE after controlling for demographic variables. ARCS performance was associated with employment status [χ2(1)=7.16, p=0.007].
The ARCS may be sensitive to the cognitive deficits in outpatients with schizophrenia and an indicator of functional outcomes in this population.
本研究调查了录音认知筛查(ARCS)相对于简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和可重复神经心理状态评估量表(RBANS)检测精神分裂症患者认知缺陷的能力,并探讨了ARCS与功能结局之间的关联。我们假设,与MMSE相比,ARCS能够更好地区分精神分裂症患者和健康对照,并且ARCS表现将与社会和职业功能指标相关。
参与者为19名来自澳大利亚精神分裂症研究库(ASRB)的社区居住精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者以及19名健康对照。参与者完成了ARCS、MMSE以及社会和职业功能的自我报告测量。还利用了ASRB存储的临床和诊断数据。
精神分裂症组在ARCS上的表现比对照组差,记忆方面,t(36)=2.49,p=0.02,95%置信区间[-1.84,-18.79];流畅性方面,t(36)=2.40,p=0.02,95%置信区间[-1.87,-22.24],这些领域是主要的区分指标。RBANS也能区分两组,并且ARCS和RBANS总分具有中度到高度的相关性。在控制人口统计学变量后,两组在MMSE上没有差异。ARCS表现与就业状况相关[χ2(1)=7.16,p=0.007]。
ARCS可能对门诊精神分裂症患者的认知缺陷敏感,并且是该人群功能结局的一个指标。