• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理健康中的性别差异:因子不变性检验

Gender differences in psychological well-being: tests of factorial invariance.

作者信息

Li Ren-Hau, Kao Chih-Mei, Wu Yi-Ying

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Chung-Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Clinical Psychological Room, Chung-Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2015 Nov;24(11):2577-81. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0999-2. Epub 2015 May 12.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-015-0999-2
PMID:25959861
Abstract

PURPOSE

This research investigated gender differences in the six factors of Li's 18-item version of Ryff's psychological well-being (PWB) scale by using factorial invariance procedures. This version improved on Ryff's shorter PWB scale in regard to the reliability of each subscale.

METHODS

The sample comprised 653 adult participants, specifically, 271 men and 382 women. Factorial invariance tests were conducted using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis.

RESULTS

The results showed that the Li's version of Ryff's PWB scale has configural invariance, factor loading invariance, intercept invariance, partial invariance of factor variances and covariances, partial invariance of latent means, and partial invariance of error variances. According to latent means, women had significantly less autonomy (AU) and more environmental mastery (EM) than men did. Moreover, based on interfactor correlations, the correlation of EM and self-acceptance was higher for men than for women, and the correlation of positive relations with others and AU was lower for men than for women.

CONCLUSIONS

Gender differences in PWB can be found at the subscale levels of Li's version, which exhibits metric and scalar invariance.

摘要

目的

本研究采用因子不变性程序,调查了李(Li)氏18项版Ryff心理幸福感(PWB)量表六个因子中的性别差异。该版本在每个子量表的信度方面对Ryff较短的PWB量表进行了改进。

方法

样本包括653名成年参与者,具体为271名男性和382名女性。使用多组验证性因子分析进行因子不变性检验。

结果

结果表明,李氏版Ryff的PWB量表具有构型不变性、因子载荷不变性、截距不变性、因子方差和协方差的部分不变性、潜在均值的部分不变性以及误差方差的部分不变性。根据潜在均值,女性的自主性(AU)显著低于男性,而环境掌控(EM)则显著高于男性。此外,基于因子间相关性,男性中EM与自我接受的相关性高于女性,而男性中与他人的积极关系与AU的相关性低于女性。

结论

在李氏版本的子量表水平上可以发现PWB的性别差异,该版本表现出度量和标量不变性。

相似文献

1
Gender differences in psychological well-being: tests of factorial invariance.心理健康中的性别差异:因子不变性检验
Qual Life Res. 2015 Nov;24(11):2577-81. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0999-2. Epub 2015 May 12.
2
[Factorial confirmatory models of Ryff's scales in a sample of elderly people].[老年人样本中Ryff量表的阶乘验证模型]
Psicothema. 2008 May;20(2):304-10.
3
The perceived constraints subscale of the Sense of Mastery Scale: dimensionality and measurement invariance.掌控感量表的感知约束子量表:维度与测量不变性
Qual Life Res. 2017 Jan;26(1):127-138. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1359-6. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
4
The 18-item Swedish version of Ryff's psychological wellbeing scale: psychometric properties based on classical test theory and item response theory.Ryff心理幸福感量表的18项瑞典语版本:基于经典测试理论和项目反应理论的心理测量特性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 3;14:1208300. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1208300. eCollection 2023.
5
Construct validity of Ryff's Scale of Psychological Well-being in Spanish older adults.Ryff心理幸福感量表在西班牙老年人中的结构效度。
Psychol Rep. 2007 Jun;100(3 Pt 2):1151-64. doi: 10.2466/pr0.100.4.1151-1164.
6
Factorial invariance of pediatric patient self-reported fatigue across age and gender: a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis approach utilizing the PedsQL™ Multidimensional Fatigue Scale.多群组验证性因子分析方法利用 PedsQL™多维疲劳量表分析儿科患者自我报告疲劳在年龄和性别上的因子不变性。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Nov;22(9):2581-94. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0370-4. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
7
The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D): Measurement equivalence across gender groups in Hispanic college students.流行病学研究抑郁量表(CES-D):西班牙裔大学生中性别群体的测量等效性。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Sep;219:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 May 14.
8
Psychological well-being (PWB): a natural life outlook? An Italian twin study on heritability of PWB in young adults.心理健康(PWB):自然的生活观?一项针对意大利年轻人 PWB 可遗传性的双胞胎研究。
Psychol Med. 2011 Dec;41(12):2637-49. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711000663. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
9
Exploring measurement invariance by gender in the profile of mood states depression subscale among cancer survivors.探究癌症幸存者情绪状态抑郁分量表中按性别划分的测量不变性。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Jan;26(1):171-175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1452-x. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
10
A cross-national analysis of measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale.跨国家分析生活满意度量表的测量不变性。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Feb;28(2):239-44. doi: 10.1037/pas0000181. Epub 2015 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of eyesight, BMI, and the use of screen-based devices on mental well-being.视力、体重指数及使用电子设备对心理健康的影响。
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Dec;40(11):2470-2474. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.11.10742.
2
Purposeful and purposeless aging: Structural issues for sense of purpose and their implications for predicting life outcomes.有目的和无目的的衰老:目的感的结构问题及其对预测生活结果的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2024 Jan;60(1):75-93. doi: 10.1037/dev0001633. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
Anxiety and depression among medical staff facing SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Preliminary analysis of the psychometric properties of Ryff's scales of psychological well-being in Portuguese adolescents.罗特的青少年心理幸福感量表的心理测量学特性的初步分析。
Span J Psychol. 2010 Nov;13(2):1032-43. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600002675.
2
Social and psychological well-being in lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals: the effects of race, gender, age, and sexual identity.女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋者的社会和心理幸福感:种族、性别、年龄和性身份的影响。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2009 Oct;79(4):500-10. doi: 10.1037/a0016848.
3
The relationship of psychological well-being to distress and personality.
中国医护人员在面对 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种时的焦虑和抑郁。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Mar 1;324:632-636. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.151. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
4
Psychological Well-Being Increment as Post-Traumatic Growth in Women with Breast Cancer: A Controlled Comparison Design Using Propensity Score Matching.乳腺癌女性心理幸福感提升作为创伤后成长:一项使用倾向得分匹配的对照比较设计
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 25;10(8):1388. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081388.
5
Emotional Intelligence Scale for Male Nursing Students and Its Latent Regression on Gender and Background Variables.男护生情绪智力量表及其对性别和背景变量的潜在回归
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 27;10(5):814. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050814.
6
Development of the Psychological Capital Scale for Male Nursing Students in Taiwan and Testing Its Measurement Invariance between Genders.台湾男护生心理资本量表的编制与跨性别测量不变性检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 18;19(6):3620. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063620.
7
Mindfulness and Balanced Time Perspective: Predictive Model of Psychological Well-Being and Gender Differences in College Students.正念与平衡的时间观:大学生心理健康的预测模型及性别差异
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022 Mar 10;12(3):306-318. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12030022.
8
Gender and Psychological Well-Being.性别与心理健康。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 20;16(19):3531. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193531.
9
Association of excessive smartphone use with psychological well-being among university students in Chiang Mai, Thailand.泰国清迈大学生过度使用智能手机与心理健康的关系。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):e0210294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210294. eCollection 2019.
10
Gender Differences in Dietary Patterns and Their Association with the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome among Chinese: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国人群饮食模式的性别差异及其与代谢综合征患病率的关联:一项横断面研究
Nutrients. 2016 Mar 25;8(4):180. doi: 10.3390/nu8040180.
心理健康与痛苦及人格的关系。
Psychother Psychosom. 2003 Sep-Oct;72(5):268-75. doi: 10.1159/000071898.
4
Measuring psychological well-being in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging.在加拿大健康与老龄化研究中测量心理健康状况。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2001;13 Supp 1:79-90. doi: 10.1017/s1041610202008013.
5
My children and me: midlife evaluations of grown children and of self.我和我的孩子:对成年子女及自我的中年评估。
Psychol Aging. 1994 Jun;9(2):195-205. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.9.2.195.
6
The structure of psychological well-being revisited.再探心理健康的结构。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Oct;69(4):719-27. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.719.