• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险管理式医疗的溢出效应与治疗强度

Medicare Managed Care Spillovers and Treatment Intensity.

作者信息

Callison Kevin

机构信息

Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2016 Jul;25(7):873-87. doi: 10.1002/hec.3191. Epub 2015 May 11.

DOI:10.1002/hec.3191
PMID:25960418
Abstract

Evidence suggests that the share of Medicare managed care enrollees in a region affects the costs of treating traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries; however, little is known about the mechanisms through which these 'spillover effects' operate. This paper examines the relationship between Medicare managed care penetration and treatment intensity for FFS enrollees hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of AMI. I find that increased Medicare managed care penetration is associated with a reduction in both the costs and the treatment intensity of FFS AMI patients. Specifically, as Medicare managed care penetration increases, FFS AMI patients are less likely to receive surgical reperfusion and mechanical ventilation and to experience an overall reduction in the number of inpatient procedures. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

摘要

有证据表明,某地区医疗保险管理式医疗参保人的比例会影响传统按服务收费(FFS)医疗保险受益人的治疗成本;然而,对于这些“溢出效应”的作用机制,我们知之甚少。本文研究了医疗保险管理式医疗渗透率与以急性心肌梗死(AMI)为主诊断住院的FFS参保人的治疗强度之间的关系。我发现,医疗保险管理式医疗渗透率的提高与FFS AMI患者的成本和治疗强度降低有关。具体而言,随着医疗保险管理式医疗渗透率的提高,FFS AMI患者接受手术再灌注和机械通气的可能性降低,住院手术数量总体减少。版权所有© 2015约翰威立国际出版公司。

相似文献

1
Medicare Managed Care Spillovers and Treatment Intensity.医疗保险管理式医疗的溢出效应与治疗强度
Health Econ. 2016 Jul;25(7):873-87. doi: 10.1002/hec.3191. Epub 2015 May 11.
2
Impact of managed care on the treatment, costs, and outcomes of fee-for-service Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction.管理式医疗对按服务收费的急性心肌梗死医疗保险患者的治疗、费用及预后的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Feb;39(1):131-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00219.x.
3
The spillover effects of Medicare managed care: Medicare Advantage and hospital utilization.医疗保险管理式医疗的溢出效应:医疗保险优势计划与医院利用情况。
J Health Econ. 2013 Dec;32(6):1289-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.09.005.
4
Is the type of Medicare insurance associated with colorectal cancer screening prevalence and selection of screening strategy?医疗保险类型与结直肠癌筛查普及率及筛查策略的选择有关吗?
Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S84-90. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817fdf80.
5
Association of managed care market share and health expenditures for fee-for-service Medicare patients.按服务收费的医疗保险患者的管理式医疗市场份额与医疗支出的关联
JAMA. 1999 Feb 3;281(5):432-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.5.432.
6
Managed care and medical expenditures of Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的管理式医疗与医疗支出
J Health Econ. 2008 Dec;27(6):1451-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.07.014. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
7
Comparing the Health Care Experiences of Medicare Beneficiaries with and without Depressive Symptoms in Medicare Managed Care versus Fee-for-Service.比较医疗保险管理式医疗与按服务收费模式下有和没有抑郁症状的医疗保险受益人的医疗保健经历。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun;51(3):1002-20. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12359. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
8
Disenrollment from Medicare HMOs.退出医疗保险健康维护组织
Am J Manag Care. 2001 Jan;7(1):37-51.
9
Mortality, Hospitalizations, and Expenditures for the Medicare Population Aged 65 Years or Older, 1999-2013.1999 - 2013年65岁及以上医疗保险人群的死亡率、住院率和费用支出
JAMA. 2015 Jul 28;314(4):355-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8035.
10
Hospice use in Medicare managed care and fee-for-service systems.医疗保险管理式医疗和按服务收费系统中的临终关怀服务使用情况。
Am J Manag Care. 2001 Aug;7(8):777-86.

引用本文的文献

1
Spillover Effects of Medicare Advantage on Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries With Prostate Cancer.医疗保险优势计划对患有前列腺癌的传统医疗保险受益人的溢出效应。
Cancer Med. 2025 Mar;14(6):e70796. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70796.
2
Spending Changes After Moving to Areas With Greater ACO Participation Among Nonattributed Medicare Beneficiaries.非归属医疗保险受益人群转移至ACO参与度更高地区后的支出变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2458311. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.58311.
3
Primary Care Physicians In Medicare Advantage Were Less Costly, Provided Similar Quality Versus Regional Average.
在医疗保险优势计划中,初级保健医生的成本较低,其提供的质量与地区平均水平相当。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Mar;43(3):372-380. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00803.
4
Association of Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare With 30-Day Mortality Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.医疗保险优势计划与传统医疗保险在急性心肌梗死患者 30 天死亡率方面的关联。
JAMA. 2022 Dec 6;328(21):2126-2135. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.20982.
5
Measuring the Scope of Prior Authorization Policies: Applying Private Insurer Rules to Medicare Part B.测量预先授权政策的范围:将私人保险公司的规定应用于医疗保险 B 部分。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 May 28;2(5):e210859. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0859. eCollection 2021 May.
6
Trading spaces: Medicare's regulatory spillovers on treatment setting for non-Medicare patients.交易空间:医疗保险对非医疗保险患者治疗场所的监管溢出效应。
J Health Econ. 2022 Jul;84:102624. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102624. Epub 2022 May 14.
7
Mechanical Ventilation and Survival in Patients With Advanced Dementia in Medicare Advantage.医疗保险优势计划中晚期痴呆患者的机械通气与生存
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jun;63(6):1006-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.011. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
8
Exploring the relationship between functional limitations of the older adults and the health-related quality of life of their spouse in Shaanxi Province, China.探讨中国陕西省老年人的功能障碍与配偶健康相关生活质量之间的关系。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Aug 30;19(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01835-4.
9
Home Dialysis in the Prospective Payment System Era.预期支付系统时代的家庭透析
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Oct;28(10):2993-3004. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017010041. Epub 2017 May 10.
10
Comparison of Low-Value Care in Medicaid vs Commercially Insured Populations.医疗补助与商业保险人群中低价值医疗的比较
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):998-1004. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2086.