Suppr超能文献

预期支付系统时代的家庭透析

Home Dialysis in the Prospective Payment System Era.

作者信息

Lin Eugene, Cheng Xingxing S, Chin Kuo-Kai, Zubair Talhah, Chertow Glenn M, Bendavid Eran, Bhattacharya Jayanta

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, and

Center for Health Policy and Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

出版信息

J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Oct;28(10):2993-3004. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017010041. Epub 2017 May 10.

Abstract

The ESRD Prospective Payment System introduced two incentives to increase home dialysis use: bundling injectable medications into a single payment for treatment and paying for home dialysis training. We evaluated the effects of the ESRD Prospective Payment System on home dialysis use by patients starting dialysis in the United States from January 1, 2006 to August 31, 2013. We analyzed data on dialysis modality, insurance type, and comorbidities from the United States Renal Data System. We estimated the effect of the policy on home dialysis use with multivariable logistic regression and compared the effect on Medicare Parts A/B beneficiaries with the effect on patients with other types of insurance. The ESRD Prospective Payment System associated with a 5.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4.0% to 6.0%) increase in home dialysis use by the end of the study period. Home dialysis use increased by 5.8% (95% CI, 4.3% to 6.9%) among Medicare beneficiaries and 4.1% (95% CI, 2.3% to 5.4%) among patients covered by other forms of health insurance. The difference between these groups was not statistically significant (1.8%; 95% CI, -0.2% to 3.8%). Conversely, in both populations, the training add-on did not associate with increases in home dialysis use beyond the effect of the policy. The ESRD Prospective Payment System bundling, but not the training add-on, associated with substantial increases in home dialysis, which were identical for both Medicare and non-Medicare patients. These spill-over effects suggest that major payment changes in Medicare can affect all patients with ESRD.

摘要

终末期肾病前瞻性支付系统引入了两项激励措施以增加家庭透析的使用

将注射药物捆绑到单次治疗费用中支付以及支付家庭透析培训费用。我们评估了终末期肾病前瞻性支付系统对2006年1月1日至2013年8月31日在美国开始透析的患者使用家庭透析的影响。我们分析了来自美国肾脏数据系统的透析方式、保险类型和合并症的数据。我们使用多变量逻辑回归估计了该政策对家庭透析使用的影响,并比较了对医疗保险A/B部分受益人的影响与对其他类型保险患者的影响。到研究期结束时,终末期肾病前瞻性支付系统使家庭透析的使用增加了5.0%(95%置信区间[95%CI],4.0%至6.0%)。医疗保险受益人中家庭透析的使用增加了5.8%(95%CI,4.3%至6.9%),其他形式医疗保险覆盖的患者中增加了4.1%(95%CI,2.3%至5.4%)。这两组之间的差异无统计学意义(1.8%;95%CI,-0.2%至3.8%)。相反,在这两个人群中,培训附加费用与家庭透析使用的增加无关,超出了政策的影响。终末期肾病前瞻性支付系统的捆绑支付,而非培训附加费用,与家庭透析的大幅增加相关,这对医疗保险和非医疗保险患者都是相同的。这些溢出效应表明医疗保险中的重大支付变化可以影响所有终末期肾病患者。

相似文献

1
Home Dialysis in the Prospective Payment System Era.预期支付系统时代的家庭透析
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Oct;28(10):2993-3004. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017010041. Epub 2017 May 10.

引用本文的文献

2
Integrated home dialysis model: facilitating home-to-home transition.综合家庭透析模式:促进家庭间的过渡。
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Jun 5;17(Suppl 1):i21-i33. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae079. eCollection 2024 May.
4

本文引用的文献

5
Review of predialysis education programs: a need for standardization.透析前教育项目综述:标准化的必要性。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Sep 9;9:1279-91. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S81284. eCollection 2015.
6
Medicare Managed Care Spillovers and Treatment Intensity.医疗保险管理式医疗的溢出效应与治疗强度
Health Econ. 2016 Jul;25(7):873-87. doi: 10.1002/hec.3191. Epub 2015 May 11.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验