Caprara Gian Vittorio, Luengo Kanacri Bernadette Paula, Zuffianò Antonio, Gerbino Maria, Pastorelli Concetta
Department of Psychology, Sapienza, Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.
COES - The Centre for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies, P. Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Dec;44(12):2211-29. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0293-1. Epub 2015 May 12.
Prosocial behaviors are considered integral to intervention goals that seek to promote successful youth development. This study examines the effect of a school-based intervention program entirely designed to promote prosocial behaviors called Promoting Prosocial and Emotional Skills to Counteract Externalizing Problems in Adolescence (Italian acronym CEPIDEA). The CEPIDEA curriculum was incorporated into routine educational practices and included five major components that reflect the personal determinants of prosocial behavior during adolescence. The present study assessed 151 students (48.7% female; M(age) = 12.4) of the intervention school and 140 students (51.2% female; M(age) = 13.0) of the control school at three points. A multi-group latent curve analysis revealed that the intervention group, compared with the control group, showed an increase in prosocial behavior, interpersonal self-efficacy beliefs, and agreeableness along with a decrease in physical aggression above and beyond the normative developmental trend of the these variables. Participants of the intervention also obtained higher grades than the control group at the end of middle school. Moderation effects for prosocial behavior and agreeableness evidenced that those who benefited most from the intervention were those adolescents with lower normative development of prosocial behavior, low initial level of agreeableness, and high initial level of physical aggression. The results also showed that the increase of prosocial behaviors mediated the decline of verbal aggression in adolescents who had attended the intervention. These findings suggest that interventions aimed at promoting prosocial behaviors while having the potential to support positive outcomes may also counteract or redirect negative trajectories of functioning.
亲社会行为被认为是旨在促进青少年成功发展的干预目标的一个组成部分。本研究考察了一个完全旨在促进亲社会行为的校本干预项目的效果,该项目名为“促进亲社会和情感技能以应对青少年外化问题”(意大利语首字母缩写为CEPIDEA)。CEPIDEA课程被纳入日常教育实践,包括五个主要部分,这些部分反映了青少年时期亲社会行为的个人决定因素。本研究在三个时间点对干预学校的151名学生(48.7%为女性;平均年龄 = 12.4岁)和对照学校的140名学生(51.2%为女性;平均年龄 = 13.0岁)进行了评估。多组潜在曲线分析表明,与对照组相比,干预组的亲社会行为、人际自我效能信念和宜人性有所增加,同时身体攻击行为有所减少,且超出了这些变量的正常发展趋势。干预组的参与者在中学结束时的成绩也高于对照组。亲社会行为和宜人性的调节效应表明,从干预中受益最大的是那些亲社会行为正常发展较低、宜人性初始水平较低且身体攻击初始水平较高的青少年。结果还表明,亲社会行为的增加介导了参加干预的青少年言语攻击行为的减少。这些发现表明,旨在促进亲社会行为同时有可能支持积极结果的干预措施,也可能抵消或改变负面的功能轨迹。