Mosli Mahmoud H, Zou Guangyong, Garg Sushil K, Feagan Sean G, MacDonald John K, Chande Nilesh, Sandborn William J, Feagan Brian G
1] Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada [2] Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia [3] Robarts Clinical Trials, Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
1] Robarts Clinical Trials, Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada [2] Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun;110(6):802-19; quiz 820. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.120. Epub 2015 May 12.
Persistent disease activity is associated with a poor prognosis in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, monitoring of patients with intent to suppress subclinical inflammation has emerged as a treatment concept. As endoscopic monitoring is invasive and resource intensive, identification of valid markers of disease activity is a priority. The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein (CRP), fecal calprotectin (FC), and stool lactoferrin (SL) for assessment of endoscopically defined disease activity in IBD.
Databases were searched from inception to November 6, 2014 for relevant cohort and case-control studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CRP, FC, or SL and used endoscopy as a gold standard in patients with symptoms consistent with active IBD. Sensitivities and specificities were pooled to generate operating property estimates for each test using a bivariate diagnostic meta-analysis.
Nineteen studies (n=2499 patients) were eligible. The pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates for CRP, FC, and SL were 0.49 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.64) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.72-0.96), 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.90) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.66-0.79), and 0.82 (95% CI 0.73-0.88) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.62-0.89), respectively. FC was more sensitive than CRP in both diseases and was more sensitive in ulcerative colitis than Crohn's disease.
Although CRP, FC, and SL are useful biomarkers, their value in managing individual patients must be considered in specific clinical contexts.
持续性疾病活动与炎症性肠病(IBD)的不良预后相关。因此,旨在抑制亚临床炎症的患者监测已成为一种治疗理念。由于内镜监测具有侵入性且资源消耗大,确定有效的疾病活动标志物成为当务之急。目的是评估C反应蛋白(CRP)、粪便钙卫蛋白(FC)和粪便乳铁蛋白(SL)用于评估IBD内镜定义的疾病活动的诊断准确性。
检索自建库至2014年11月6日的数据库,查找评估CRP、FC或SL诊断准确性并将内镜检查作为症状符合活动性IBD患者金标准的相关队列研究和病例对照研究。使用双变量诊断荟萃分析汇总敏感性和特异性,以生成每项检测的操作特性估计值。
19项研究(n = 2499例患者)符合条件。CRP、FC和SL的汇总敏感性和特异性估计值分别为0.49(95%置信区间(CI)0.34 - 0.64)和0.92(95%CI 0.72 - 0.96)、0.88(95%CI 0.84 - 0.90)和0.73(95%CI 0.66 - 0.79)、0.82(95%CI 0.73 - 0.88)和0.79(95%CI 0.62 - 0.89)。在两种疾病中,FC均比CRP更敏感,且在溃疡性结肠炎中比克罗恩病更敏感。
虽然CRP、FC和SL是有用的生物标志物,但在具体临床背景下必须考虑它们在管理个体患者中的价值。