• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常眼压性青光眼和高眼压性青光眼的视野损害

Visual field damage in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma.

作者信息

Chauhan B C, Drance S M, Douglas G R, Johnson C A

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 Dec 15;108(6):636-42. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90854-4.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9394(89)90854-4
PMID:2596542
Abstract

We studied the ocular characteristics of 40 pairs of normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma patients who matched closely for the extent of field damage, pupil size, and visual acuity. To determine if there were differences in visual field damage between patients with normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma, we studied characteristics of the areas of the patients' visual fields that were undisturbed. We computed the number of normal locations, the number of clustered normal locations, and the size of the largest cluster of normal locations. The results showed that for an equivalent extent of damage, the individuals in the normal-tension group had greater areas with normal sensitivity, hence more localized damage. A comparison of the patient data to control data showed that paired differences were larger when the normal-tension member of a pair had a larger value in any of the parameters. The results support the hypothesis that glaucoma patients with lower intraocular pressures have more localized damage and those with higher intraocular pressures have more diffuse damage.

摘要

我们研究了40对原发性开角型青光眼和原发性闭角型青光眼患者的眼部特征,这些患者在视野损害程度、瞳孔大小和视力方面密切匹配。为了确定原发性开角型青光眼和原发性闭角型青光眼患者在视野损害方面是否存在差异,我们研究了患者视野中未受干扰区域的特征。我们计算了正常位置的数量、聚集正常位置的数量以及最大正常位置簇的大小。结果表明,在同等损害程度下,原发性开角型青光眼组个体具有更大的正常敏感度区域,因此损害更局限。将患者数据与对照数据进行比较表明,当一对患者中开角型青光眼患者在任何参数上的值较大时,配对差异更大。结果支持了以下假设:眼压较低的青光眼患者损害更局限,而眼压较高的患者损害更弥漫。

相似文献

1
Visual field damage in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma.正常眼压性青光眼和高眼压性青光眼的视野损害
Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 Dec 15;108(6):636-42. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90854-4.
2
Visual field defects in patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with high-tension glaucoma.
Am J Ophthalmol. 1992 Dec 15;114(6):758-63. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)74056-5.
3
The influence of intraocular pressure on visual field damage in patients with normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma.眼压对正常眼压性和高眼压性青光眼患者视野损害的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990 Nov;31(11):2367-72.
4
Comparison of the optic nerve head in high- and low-tension glaucoma.高眼压性青光眼与低眼压性青光眼视神经乳头的比较。
Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Aug;103(8):1145-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050080057020.
5
Pattern of visual field defects in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma.正常眼压性青光眼和高眼压性青光眼的视野缺损模式
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1995 Apr;6(2):36-45. doi: 10.1097/00055735-199504000-00007.
6
[Visual field changes in normal pressure glaucoma and their association with risk factors].[正常眼压性青光眼的视野改变及其与危险因素的关联]
Klin Oczna. 2016;118(3):208-13.
7
The relationship between intraocular pressure and visual field progression in glaucoma.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1992;230(6):521-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00181772.
8
[Are there genuine and pseudo-normal pressure glaucomas? Body position-dependent intraocular pressure values in normal pressure glaucoma].[存在真性和假性正常眼压性青光眼吗?正常眼压性青光眼中体位依赖性眼压值]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1997 Oct;211(4):235-40. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035128.
9
[Absolute filling defects of the optic disc in fluorescein angiograms in glaucoma--a retrospective clinical study].[青光眼患者荧光素血管造影中视盘的绝对充盈缺损——一项回顾性临床研究]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2001 Apr;218(4):214-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-14916.
10
Influence of posture on the visual field in glaucoma patients and controls.
Ophthalmologica. 1995;209(3):129-31. doi: 10.1159/000310597.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual field patterns in glaucoma: A systematic review.青光眼的视野模式:一项系统综述。
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 26;38(4):306-315. doi: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_143_24. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
2
Visualising structural and functional characteristics distinguishing between newly diagnosed high-tension and low-tension glaucoma patients.可视化区分新发高压性和低压性青光眼患者的结构和功能特征。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 Jul;43(4):771-787. doi: 10.1111/opo.13129. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
3
Intraocular asymmetry of visual field defects in primary angle-closure glaucoma, high-tension glaucoma, and normal-tension glaucoma in a Chinese population.
中国人原发性闭角型青光眼、高眼压型青光眼和正常眼压型青光眼的视野缺损的眼内不对称性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 3;11(1):11674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91173-8.
4
Validating Variational Bayes Linear Regression Method With Multi-Central Datasets.验证多中心数据集的变分贝叶斯线性回归方法。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Apr 1;59(5):1897-1904. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22907.
5
[Current aspects on the management of normal tension glaucoma].[正常眼压性青光眼治疗的当前进展]
Ophthalmologe. 2015 Nov;112(11):943-54; quiz 955-6. doi: 10.1007/s00347-015-0140-5.
6
New directions in the treatment of normal tension glaucoma.正常眼压性青光眼治疗的新方向。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 May;62(5):529-37. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.133481.
7
Nocturnal systemic hypotension increases the risk of glaucoma progression.夜间系统性低血压会增加青光眼病情进展的风险。
Ophthalmology. 2014 Oct;121(10):2004-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.016. Epub 2014 May 25.
8
Early glaucoma involves both deep local, and shallow widespread, retinal nerve fiber damage of the macular region.早期青光眼涉及局部深层和广泛浅层的黄斑区视网膜神经纤维损伤。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Feb 3;55(2):632-49. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13130.
9
Initial central scotomas vs peripheral scotomas in normal-tension glaucoma: clinical characteristics and progression rates.正常眼压性青光眼中的初始中心暗点与周边暗点:临床特征及进展率
Eye (Lond). 2014 Mar;28(3):303-11. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.285. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
10
Neuroprotection of rat retinal ganglion cells mediated through alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.通过α7 型烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体介导对大鼠视网膜神经节细胞的神经保护作用。
Neuroscience. 2013 May 1;237:184-98. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Feb 10.