Cho H-K, Lee J, Lee M, Kee C
Department of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Ophthalmology, Kong Eye Center, Seoul, Korea.
Eye (Lond). 2014 Mar;28(3):303-11. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.285. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
To investigate clinical characteristics and progression rates of the initial central scotomas (ICS) compared with the initial peripheral scotomas (IPS) in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) patients.
Among NTG patients showing a single hemifield defect and who performed more than five reliable standard visual field (VF) tests, medical records of ICS (involvement of ≥3 adjacent points with P<5% within the central 12° of fixation and one point with a P<0.01 within the central 6° of fixation) (n=32) or IPS (no VF abnormality within the central 6° of fixation) (n=34) were retrospectively analyzed. The changes of mean thresholds from 10 zones of the glaucoma hemifield test, central 6° and 12° zones, peripheral zones other than central 6° and 12°, and the entire hemifield were inspected. To calculate the progression rates, linear mixed-effect model was employed.
There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, gender, ocular factors including baseline/mean treated intraocular pressure, and systemic factors including systolic or diastolic blood pressure/perfusion pressure, mean ocular perfusion pressure (all P>0.05). There were no significant differences in baseline mean deviation and pattern standard deviation (P>0.05) between the two groups, but VF index was significantly lower in ICS group than in IPS group (P=0.001). The progression rates between the two groups were not significantly different in all zones we investigated (all P>0.05).
Newly diagnosed cases of NTG with ICS may not differ from those with IPS in clinical characteristics and progression rates under treatment.
研究正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)患者初始中心暗点(ICS)与初始周边暗点(IPS)的临床特征及进展率。
在表现为单眼半视野缺损且进行了超过五次可靠标准视野(VF)检查的NTG患者中,回顾性分析ICS(在注视中心12°范围内≥3个相邻点P<5%且在注视中心6°范围内有1个点P<0.01)(n=32)或IPS(注视中心6°范围内无VF异常)(n=34)患者的病历。检查青光眼半视野测试10个区域、中心6°和12°区域、中心6°和12°以外的周边区域以及整个半视野的平均阈值变化。为计算进展率,采用线性混合效应模型。
两组在年龄、性别、包括基线/平均治疗眼压在内的眼部因素以及包括收缩压或舒张压/灌注压、平均眼灌注压在内的全身因素方面均无显著差异(所有P>0.05)。两组之间的基线平均偏差和模式标准偏差无显著差异(P>0.05),但ICS组的VF指数显著低于IPS组(P=0.001)。在我们研究的所有区域中,两组之间的进展率无显著差异(所有P>0.05)。
新诊断的伴有ICS的NTG病例与伴有IPS的病例在临床特征和治疗下的进展率方面可能无差异。