Suppr超能文献

关节周围注射持续局部麻醉浸润与股神经和坐骨神经阻滞相比,能为 TKA 术后提供更好的疼痛缓解和功能恢复:一项随机临床试验。

Periarticular injections with continuous perfusion of local anaesthetics provide better pain relief and better function compared to femoral and sciatic blocks after TKA: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department for Endoprosthetics Lower Extremity and Foot Surgery, Sportklinik Stuttgart GmbH, Taubenheimstr. 8, 70372, Stuttgart, Germany.

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Sep;25(9):2702-2707. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3633-5. Epub 2015 May 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Combined femoral and sciatic nerve blocks for post-operative pain management following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improve patient satisfaction, decrease narcotic consumption and improve pain. However, accompanying motoric weakness can cause falls and related complications. We wonder whether peri-capsular injections in combination with intra-articular perfusion of local anaesthetics would result in equal or less pain without the related complications of nerve blocks. The objective of the study was to verify these aspects in a prospective randomized trial comparing both treatments.

METHODS

Fifty TKA patients randomly received either a femoral (continuous) and a sciatic (single-shot) nerve block (CFNB group, 25 knees) or periarticular infiltrations and a continuous post-operative intra-articular infusion (PIAC group, 25 knees). VAS for pain, pain medication consumption, functional assessment, straight leg raising as well as KSS were recorded post-operatively for 6 days.

RESULTS

VAS (p < 0.001) and KSS (p = 0.05) were significantly better for PIAC. There was increased pain following CFNB compared to PIAC. Catheters stayed for 4 days, a pain 'rebound' occurred after removing in CFNB but not after PIAC. There was no difference in regard to knee function (n.s.), but straight leg raising was significant better following PIAC. There were two falls in patients with CFNB.

CONCLUSION

Peri-capsular injections combined with an intra-articular catheter provide better pain control, no rebound pain with better function and might decrease the risk of complications related to motor weakness.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

摘要

目的

全膝关节置换术(TKA)后联合股神经和坐骨神经阻滞用于术后疼痛管理可提高患者满意度,减少阿片类药物的消耗,并改善疼痛。然而,伴随的运动无力会导致跌倒和相关并发症。我们想知道囊周注射联合关节内局部麻醉灌注是否会产生同等或更少的疼痛,而没有神经阻滞的相关并发症。本研究的目的是通过一项前瞻性随机试验来验证这两种治疗方法在这方面的效果,比较这两种治疗方法。

方法

50 例 TKA 患者随机接受股神经(连续)和坐骨神经(单次)阻滞(CFNB 组,25 膝)或囊周浸润和连续术后关节内灌注(PIAC 组,25 膝)。术后 6 天内记录视觉模拟评分(VAS)用于疼痛、疼痛药物消耗、功能评估、直腿抬高以及膝关节评分系统(KSS)。

结果

VAS(p<0.001)和 KSS(p=0.05)在 PIAC 组中明显更好。与 PIAC 相比,CFNB 后疼痛增加。与 PIAC 相比,CFNB 中的导管留置 4 天,在移除 CFNB 后会出现疼痛“反弹”,但在 PIAC 后不会出现。在膝关节功能方面没有差异(无统计学意义),但直腿抬高在 PIAC 后明显更好。CFNB 组中有 2 例患者跌倒。

结论

囊周注射联合关节内导管可提供更好的疼痛控制,无反弹疼痛,功能更好,可能降低与运动无力相关的并发症风险。

证据水平

I。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验