• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在旧金山社区基层医疗诊所增加结直肠癌筛查

Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening at Community-Based Primary Care Clinics in San Francisco.

作者信息

Marx Rani, Tse Winnie M, Golden Lisa, Johnson Elizabeth C

机构信息

Primary Care (Dr Marx and Ms Tse) and Ambulatory Care (Dr Golden), San Francisco Health Network, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California; and Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco (Drs Golden and Johnson).

出版信息

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Sep-Oct;22(5):466-71. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000275.

DOI:10.1097/PHH.0000000000000275
PMID:25968085
Abstract

CONTEXT

Adult colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) can lower disease incidence and mortality. However, widespread implementation is inconsistent, especially in the public sector. While specific interventions to increase CRCS have been identified, firsthand accounts of CRCS improvement efforts using multiple techniques in public sector settings are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

A program evaluation was conducted to assess the effect of implementing a culture of continuous quality improvement (QI) on CRCS practices and prevalence. A multipronged incremental effort over more than a decade to increase CRCS at the San Francisco Department of Public Health is described.

SETTING

Community-based primary care clinics.

PARTICIPANTS

Departmental activities and 5 clinics providing full-scope primary care to CRCS-eligible adults who participated in departmental activities and outreach interventions were assessed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Departmental and clinic-specific CRCS activities and prevalence.

RESULTS

Efforts included departmental prioritization; data-driven QI incorporating routine data sharing (monthly reports and data walls); departmental and clinic-specific QI committees; panel management (a team approach to generation of eligibility lists prior to scheduled visits, routinely offering screening during appointments or mailing test kits for patients without appointments); and departmental mail and phone outreach events. Screening ranged from 36.6% to 54.4% in 2010; in 2013, it ranged from 43.6% to 70.2%. Increases occurred consistently over that time in 3 of the 5 clinics and ranged from 1.1% to 14.5%; decreases occurred during 2 intervals in 2 clinics and ranged from 2.3% to 4.3%.

CONCLUSION

CRCS prevalence can be markedly improved in the public sector with a data-driven panel management approach supported by departmental and clinic-specific QI committees and group outreach events. Continued prioritization of and focus on CRCS is required to ensure long-term success. Even small increases will result in avoidable morbidity and mortality associated with this highly preventable disease.

摘要

背景

成人结直肠癌筛查(CRCS)可降低疾病发病率和死亡率。然而,广泛实施情况并不一致,尤其是在公共部门。虽然已确定了增加CRCS的具体干预措施,但缺乏在公共部门环境中使用多种技术进行CRCS改进工作的第一手资料。

目的

进行一项项目评估,以评估实施持续质量改进(QI)文化对CRCS实践和普及率的影响。描述了在十多年里旧金山公共卫生部为增加CRCS所做的多方面渐进式努力。

地点

社区基层医疗诊所。

参与者

评估了部门活动以及为符合CRCS条件且参与部门活动和外展干预的成年人提供全面基层医疗服务的5家诊所。

主要观察指标

部门和诊所特定的CRCS活动及普及率。

结果

所做努力包括部门优先排序;纳入常规数据共享(月度报告和数据墙)的数据驱动QI;部门和诊所特定的QI委员会;小组管理(一种在预定就诊前生成资格名单的团队方法,在预约期间常规提供筛查或为未预约患者邮寄检测试剂盒);以及部门邮件和电话外展活动。2010年筛查率在36.6%至54.4%之间;2013年,筛查率在43.6%至70.2%之间。在此期间,5家诊所中有3家持续上升,增幅在1.1%至14.5%之间;2家诊所出现过2次下降,降幅在2.3%至4.3%之间。

结论

在部门和诊所特定的QI委员会以及团体外展活动支持下,采用数据驱动的小组管理方法可显著提高公共部门的CRCS普及率。要确保长期成功,需要持续对CRCS进行优先排序并予以关注。即使是小幅提高也将减少与这种高度可预防疾病相关的可避免的发病率和死亡率。

相似文献

1
Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening at Community-Based Primary Care Clinics in San Francisco.在旧金山社区基层医疗诊所增加结直肠癌筛查
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Sep-Oct;22(5):466-71. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000275.
2
Comparative effectiveness of two pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening interventions during an annual influenza vaccination campaign.两种基于药房的结直肠癌筛查干预措施在年度流感疫苗接种活动中的比较效果。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2010;50(2):181-7. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2010.09199.
3
Offering annual fecal occult blood tests at annual flu shot clinics increases colorectal cancer screening rates.在年度流感疫苗接种诊所提供年度粪便潜血检测可提高结直肠癌筛查率。
Ann Fam Med. 2009 Jan-Feb;7(1):17-23. doi: 10.1370/afm.934.
4
Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.提高初级保健中结直肠癌筛查参与度的干预措施:系统评价。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Jul-Aug;35(4):840-858. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.04.210399.
5
The effectiveness of the FLU-FOBT program in primary care a randomized trial.在初级保健中 FLU-FOBT 方案的效果:一项随机试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jul;41(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.011.
6
Improving colorectal cancer screening in family medicine: an Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) study.改善家庭医学中的结直肠癌筛查:俄克拉荷马州医师资源/研究网络(OKPRN)的一项研究。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(5):498-507. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.120230.
7
Utilization of Colorectal Cancer Screening among Saudi Elderly Population: A Study from the Saudi National Survey for Elderly Health.沙特老年人群中结直肠癌筛查的应用:来自沙特全国老年人健康调查的一项研究
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Dec 25;19(12):3401-3407. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2018.19.12.3401.
8
A conceptual framework and metrics for evaluating multicomponent interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening within an organized screening program.用于评估在有组织的筛查计划中增加结直肠癌筛查的多组分干预措施的概念框架和指标。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4154-4162. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31686. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
9
The FLU-FIT program: an effective colorectal cancer screening program for high volume flu shot clinics.FLU-FIT 计划:一种针对高容量流感疫苗接种诊所的有效结直肠癌筛查计划。
Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(8):577-83.
10
Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates Increased after Exposure to the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH).接触以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)后,结直肠癌筛查率有所提高。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;29(2):191-200. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.02.150290.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary care practice-based interventions and their effect on participation in population-based cancer screening programs: a systematic narrative review.基于初级保健实践的干预及其对参与基于人群的癌症筛查计划的影响:系统叙述性综述。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Feb 12;25:e12. doi: 10.1017/S1463423623000713.
2
Estimated impact of COVID-19 on preventive care service delivery: an observational cohort study.估算 COVID-19 对预防保健服务提供的影响:一项观察性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 16;21(1):1107. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07131-7.