Suppr超能文献

i-Smart 30兽医电解质分析仪在犬、猫、牛和猪中的准确性和精密度评估。

Assessment of the accuracy and precision of the i-Smart 30 VET Electrolyte Analyzer in dogs, cats, cattle and pigs.

作者信息

Kim Han-Jun, Lee Hye-Rim, Park Yoon-Seo, Kyung Soon-Goo, Do Sun Hee

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.

Gyeonggi Large Animal Clinic, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

出版信息

Vet Clin Pathol. 2015 Sep;44(3):410-9. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12267. Epub 2015 May 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Performance evaluation of point-of-care (POC) electrolyte analyzers is essential for determining their precision and accuracy in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to validate the i-Smart 30 VET Electrolyte Analyzer for canine, feline, bovine, and porcine samples in comparison with the ion-selective electrolyte analyzer Roche 9180 electrolyte analyzer.

METHODS

A total of 400 heparinized whole blood samples were collected and analyzed by both instruments for sodium, potassium, and chloride concentrations. Within-run, between-day, and total imprecision were evaluated. Statistical analyses included tests for correlation, regression, bias, and total error.

RESULTS

The coefficients of variation (CV) of both within-run and between-day imprecisions in the i-Smart 30 VET ranged from 0.4-1.6%. In addition, total CV (0.3-1.7%) and total error (0.7-3.7%) of the i-Smart 30 VET were acceptable according to the ASVCP guidelines (< 5%). The correlation between the i-Smart 30 VET and the Roche 9180 was excellent (r > .98). There was no proportional error according to the regression (slope ranges 0.92-1.00, 95% CI includes 1.00), but a constant error was detected for sodium concentration in dogs (interval = 0.5), cattle (interval = 3.0), and pigs (interval = 4.0), and for chloride concentration in cats (interval = 1.0). Most of the bias was within 95% CI, and the total error range (0.8-3.5%) was acceptable according to ASVCP guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The i-Smart 30 VET Electrolyte Analyzer provides precise and accurate measurements of sodium, potassium, and chloride concentrations in whole blood samples from dogs, cats, cattle, and pigs.

摘要

背景

即时检验(POC)电解质分析仪的性能评估对于确定其在临床实践中的精密度和准确性至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在将i-Smart 30 VET电解质分析仪与离子选择性电解质分析仪罗氏9180电解质分析仪进行比较,以验证其对犬、猫、牛和猪样本的检测效果。

方法

共采集400份肝素化全血样本,两台仪器均对样本的钠、钾和氯浓度进行分析。评估批内、批间和总不精密度。统计分析包括相关性、回归、偏差和总误差检验。

结果

i-Smart 30 VET批内和批间不精密度的变异系数(CV)范围为0.4%-1.6%。此外,根据美国兽医临床病理学会(ASVCP)指南(<5%),i-Smart 30 VET的总CV(0.3%-1.7%)和总误差(0.7%-3.7%)是可接受的。i-Smart 30 VET与罗氏9180之间的相关性极佳(r>.98)。根据回归分析(斜率范围为0.92-1.00,95%置信区间包括1.00),不存在比例误差,但在犬(区间=0.5)、牛(区间=3.0)和猪(区间=4.0)的钠浓度以及猫(区间=1.0)的氯浓度检测中发现了恒定误差。大多数偏差在95%置信区间内,根据ASVCP指南,总误差范围(0.8%-3.5%)是可接受的。

结论

i-Smart 30 VET电解质分析仪能够精确、准确地测量犬、猫、牛和猪全血样本中的钠、钾和氯浓度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验