Suppr超能文献

测量小纤维疼痛阈值以早期检测糖尿病性多发性神经病。

Measurement of small fibre pain threshold values for the early detection of diabetic polyneuropathy.

作者信息

Kukidome D, Nishikawa T, Sato M, Igata M, Kawashima J, Shimoda S, Matsui K, Obayashi K, Ando Y, Araki E

机构信息

Department of Metabolic Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.

Department of Molecular Diabetology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2016 Jan;33(1):62-9. doi: 10.1111/dme.12797. Epub 2015 Jun 4.

Abstract

AIM

To investigate whether Aδ and C fibre pain threshold values, measured using intra-epidermal electrical stimulation (IES), in people with and without Type 2 diabetes are useful in evaluating diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) severity.

METHODS

Aδ and C fibre pain threshold values were measured in Japanese people with (n = 120) and without (n = 76) Type 2 diabetes by IES. Nerve conduction studies and other tests were performed to evaluate diabetic complications.

RESULTS

Aδ and C fibre pain threshold values were high in people with diabetes compared with control subjects (Aδ fibre: 0.050 vs. 0.030 mA, P < 0.01; C fibre: 0.180 vs. 0.070 mA, P < 0.01). Participants with diabetes and neuropathy had significantly higher Aδ and C fibre pain threshold values than participants without neuropathy (Aδ fibres 0.063 vs. 0.039 mA, P < 0.01; C fibres 0.202 vs. 0.098 mA, P < 0.05). C fibre pain threshold values were significantly higher in participants with diabetes and diabetic microvascular complications than in participants without complications. Threshold values increased with complication progression. When DPN was diagnosed according to the Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group in Japan criteria, the cut-off for the C fibre pain threshold values was 0.125 mA (area under the curve 0.758, sensitivity 81.5%, specificity 61.5%). The IES test took less time (P < 0.01) and was less invasive (P < 0.01) than the nerve conduction studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-epidermal electrical stimulation is a non-invasive and easy measurement of small fibre pain threshold values. It may be clinically useful for C fibre measurement to diagnose early DPN as defined by the Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group in Japan criteria.

摘要

目的

研究采用表皮内电刺激(IES)测量有和没有2型糖尿病的人群的Aδ和C纤维痛阈,是否有助于评估糖尿病性多发性神经病(DPN)的严重程度。

方法

通过IES测量日本有(n = 120)和没有(n = 76)2型糖尿病的人群的Aδ和C纤维痛阈。进行神经传导研究和其他测试以评估糖尿病并发症。

结果

与对照组相比,糖尿病患者的Aδ和C纤维痛阈较高(Aδ纤维:0.050对0.030 mA,P < 0.01;C纤维:0.180对0.070 mA,P < 0.01)。患有糖尿病和神经病的参与者的Aδ和C纤维痛阈显著高于没有神经病的参与者(Aδ纤维0.063对0.039 mA,P < 0.01;C纤维0.202对0.098 mA,P < 0.05)。患有糖尿病和糖尿病微血管并发症的参与者的C纤维痛阈显著高于没有并发症的参与者。阈值随着并发症进展而增加。依据日本糖尿病神经病研究组标准诊断DPN时,C纤维痛阈的截断值为0.125 mA(曲线下面积0.758,敏感性81.5%,特异性61.5%)。与神经传导研究相比,IES测试耗时更少(P < 0.01)且侵入性更小(P < 0.01)。

结论

表皮内电刺激是一种非侵入性且易于测量小纤维痛阈的方法。对于按照日本糖尿病神经病研究组标准定义的早期DPN诊断,测量C纤维可能具有临床实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验