Darbar Dawood
Divisions of Cardiovascular Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2016 Jan;67(1):9-18. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000280.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia worldwide requiring therapy. Despite recent advances in catheter-based and surgical therapy, antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) remain the mainstay of treatment for symptomatic AF. However, response in individual patients is highly variable with over half the patients treated with rhythm control therapy experiencing recurrence of AF within a year. Contemporary AADs used to suppress AF are incompletely and unpredictably effective and associated with significant risks of proarrhythmia and noncardiac toxicities. Furthermore, this "one-size" fits all strategy for selecting antiarrhythmics is based largely on minimizing risk of adverse effects rather than on the likelihood of suppressing AF. The limited success of rhythm control therapy is in part due to heterogeneity of the underlying substrate, interindividual differences in disease mechanisms, and our inability to predict response to AADs in individual patients. Genetic studies of AF over the past decade have revealed that susceptibility to and response to therapy for AF is modulated by the underlying genetic substrate. However, the bedside application of these new discoveries to the management of AF patients has thus far been disappointing. This may in part be related to our limited understanding about genetic predictors of drug response in general, the challenges associated with determining efficacy of response to AADs, and lack of randomized genotype-directed clinical trials. Nonetheless, recent studies have shown that common AF susceptibility risk alleles at the chromosome 4q25 locus modulated response to AADs, electrical cardioversion, and ablation therapy. This monograph discusses how genetic approaches to AF have not only provided important insights into underlying mechanisms but also identified AF subtypes that can be better targeted with more mechanism-based "personalized" therapy.
心房颤动(AF)是全球范围内最常见的需要治疗的持续性心律失常。尽管基于导管和手术治疗最近取得了进展,但抗心律失常药物(AADs)仍然是症状性AF治疗的主要手段。然而,个体患者的反应差异很大,超过一半接受节律控制治疗的患者在一年内会出现AF复发。用于抑制AF的当代AADs效果不完全且不可预测,并且与显著的致心律失常风险和非心脏毒性相关。此外,这种选择抗心律失常药物的“一刀切”策略很大程度上基于将不良反应风险降至最低,而不是基于抑制AF的可能性。节律控制治疗的有限成功部分归因于潜在基质的异质性、疾病机制的个体差异以及我们无法预测个体患者对AADs的反应。过去十年对AF的基因研究表明,AF的易感性和对治疗的反应受潜在基因基质的调节。然而,这些新发现床边应用于AF患者的管理迄今为止令人失望。这可能部分与我们总体上对药物反应的基因预测因素理解有限、确定对AADs反应疗效相关的挑战以及缺乏随机化的基因型指导临床试验有关。尽管如此,最近的研究表明,位于染色体4q25位点的常见AF易感性风险等位基因调节对AADs、电复律和消融治疗的反应。本专著讨论了AF的基因方法如何不仅为潜在机制提供了重要见解,还确定了可以通过更基于机制的“个性化”治疗更好靶向的AF亚型。