Amantea Diana, Micieli Giuseppe, Tassorelli Cristina, Cuartero María I, Ballesteros Iván, Certo Michelangelo, Moro María A, Lizasoain Ignacio, Bagetta Giacinto
Section of Preclinical and Translational Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria Rende, Italy.
C. Mondino National Neurological Institute Pavia, Italy.
Front Neurosci. 2015 Apr 29;9:147. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00147. eCollection 2015.
The innate immune system plays a dualistic role in the evolution of ischemic brain damage and has also been implicated in ischemic tolerance produced by different conditioning stimuli. Early after ischemia, perivascular astrocytes release cytokines and activate metalloproteases (MMPs) that contribute to blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption and vasogenic oedema; whereas at later stages, they provide extracellular glutamate uptake, BBB regeneration and neurotrophic factors release. Similarly, early activation of microglia contributes to ischemic brain injury via the production of inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-1, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and proteases. Nevertheless, microglia also contributes to the resolution of inflammation, by releasing IL-10 and tumor growth factor (TGF)-β, and to the late reparative processes by phagocytic activity and growth factors production. Indeed, after ischemia, microglia/macrophages differentiate toward several phenotypes: the M1 pro-inflammatory phenotype is classically activated via toll-like receptors or interferon-γ, whereas M2 phenotypes are alternatively activated by regulatory mediators, such as ILs 4, 10, 13, or TGF-β. Thus, immune cells exert a dualistic role on the evolution of ischemic brain damage, since the classic phenotypes promote injury, whereas alternatively activated M2 macrophages or N2 neutrophils prompt tissue remodeling and repair. Moreover, a subdued activation of the immune system has been involved in ischemic tolerance, since different preconditioning stimuli act via modulation of inflammatory mediators, including toll-like receptors and cytokine signaling pathways. This further underscores that the immuno-modulatory approach for the treatment of ischemic stroke should be aimed at blocking the detrimental effects, while promoting the beneficial responses of the immune reaction.
先天性免疫系统在缺血性脑损伤的发展过程中发挥着双重作用,并且也与不同预处理刺激所产生的缺血耐受性有关。缺血早期,血管周围星形胶质细胞释放细胞因子并激活金属蛋白酶(MMPs),这会导致血脑屏障(BBB)破坏和血管源性水肿;而在后期,它们提供细胞外谷氨酸摄取、血脑屏障再生和神经营养因子释放。同样,小胶质细胞的早期激活通过产生炎性细胞因子(包括肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)和白细胞介素(IL)-1)、活性氧和氮物质以及蛋白酶,导致缺血性脑损伤。然而,小胶质细胞也通过释放IL-10和肿瘤生长因子(TGF)-β促进炎症消退,并通过吞噬活性和生长因子产生参与后期修复过程。事实上,缺血后,小胶质细胞/巨噬细胞会分化为几种表型:M1促炎表型通常通过Toll样受体或干扰素-γ激活,而M2表型则由调节介质(如ILs 4、10、13或TGF-β)选择性激活。因此,免疫细胞在缺血性脑损伤的发展中发挥着双重作用,因为经典表型促进损伤,而选择性激活的M2巨噬细胞或N2中性粒细胞则促进组织重塑和修复。此外,免疫系统的适度激活与缺血耐受性有关,因为不同的预处理刺激通过调节炎性介质(包括Toll样受体和细胞因子信号通路)发挥作用。这进一步强调,缺血性中风的免疫调节治疗方法应旨在阻断有害影响,同时促进免疫反应的有益反应。