• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用CDISC标准和语义统计词汇对纵向临床研究数据进行语义丰富。

Semantic enrichment of longitudinal clinical study data using the CDISC standards and the semantic statistics vocabularies.

作者信息

Leroux Hugo, Lefort Laurent

机构信息

The Australian e-Health Research Centre, Digital Productivity Flagship, CSIRO, Level 5 - UQ Health Sciences Building 901/16, Brisbane, 4029 Queensland Australia.

Digital Economy Program, Digital Productivity Flagship, CSIRO, Canberra, 2601 ACT Australia.

出版信息

J Biomed Semantics. 2015 Apr 9;6:16. doi: 10.1186/s13326-015-0012-6. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1186/s13326-015-0012-6
PMID:25973166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4429421/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing recognition of the need for the data capture phase of clinical studies to be improved and for more effective sharing of clinical data. The Health Care and Life Sciences community has embraced semantic technologies to facilitate the integration of health data from electronic health records, clinical studies and pharmaceutical research. This paper explores the integration of clinical study data exchange standards and semantic statistic vocabularies to deliver clinical data as linked data in a format that is easier to enrich with links to complementary data sources and consume by a broad user base.

METHODS

We propose a Linked Clinical Data Cube (LCDC), which combines the strength of the RDF Data Cube and DDI-RDF vocabulary to enrich clinical data based on the CDISC standards. The CDISC standards provide the mechanisms for the data to be standardised, made more accessible and accountable whereas the RDF Data Cube and DDI-RDF vocabularies provide novel approaches to managing large volumes of heterogeneous linked data resources.

RESULTS

We validate our approach using a large-scale longitudinal clinical study into neurodegenerative diseases. This dataset, comprising more than 1600 variables clustered in 25 different sub-domains, has been fully converted into RDF forming one main data cube and one specialised cube for each sub-domain. One sub-domain, the Medications specialised cube, has been linked to relevant external vocabularies, such as the Australian Medicines Terminology and the ATC DDD taxonomy and DrugBank terminology. This provides new dimensions on which to query the data that promote the exploration of drug-drug and drug-disease interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

This implementation highlights the effectiveness of the association of the semantic statistics vocabularies for the publication of large heterogeneous data sets as linked data and the integration of the semantic statistics vocabularies with the CDISC standards. In particular, it demonstrates the potential of the two vocabularies in overcoming the monolithic nature of the underlying model and improving the navigation and querying of the data from multiple angles to support richer data analysis of clinical study data. The forecasted benefits are more efficient use of clinicians' time and the potential to facilitate cross-study analysis.

摘要

背景

人们日益认识到需要改进临床研究的数据采集阶段,并更有效地共享临床数据。医疗保健和生命科学领域已采用语义技术来促进来自电子健康记录、临床研究和药物研究的健康数据的整合。本文探讨了临床研究数据交换标准与语义统计词汇的整合,以便以一种更易于通过与补充数据源的链接进行丰富并被广大用户群体使用的格式,将临床数据作为关联数据提供。

方法

我们提出了一个链接临床数据立方体(Linked Clinical Data Cube,LCDC),它结合了RDF数据立方体和DDI - RDF词汇表的优势,以基于CDISC标准丰富临床数据。CDISC标准提供了使数据标准化、更易于访问和问责的机制,而RDF数据立方体和DDI - RDF词汇表提供了管理大量异构链接数据资源的新方法。

结果

我们使用一项针对神经退行性疾病的大规模纵向临床研究来验证我们的方法。该数据集包含1600多个变量,分为25个不同的子领域,已完全转换为RDF,形成一个主数据立方体和每个子领域的一个专用立方体。一个子领域,即药物专用立方体,已与相关外部词汇表链接,如澳大利亚药品术语、ATC DDD分类法和DrugBank术语。这为查询数据提供了新的维度,有助于探索药物 - 药物和药物 - 疾病相互作用。

结论

该实施突出了语义统计词汇表用于将大型异构数据集作为关联数据发布以及语义统计词汇表与CDISC标准整合的有效性。特别是,它展示了这两个词汇表在克服基础模型的整体性方面的潜力,并从多个角度改进数据的导航和查询,以支持对临床研究数据进行更丰富的数据分析。预计的好处是更有效地利用临床医生的时间以及促进跨研究分析的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6670/4429421/a0a4e9c5c7a2/13326_2015_12_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6670/4429421/91e56addc813/13326_2015_12_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6670/4429421/3151ae278480/13326_2015_12_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6670/4429421/ce253d24fa24/13326_2015_12_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6670/4429421/a0a4e9c5c7a2/13326_2015_12_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6670/4429421/91e56addc813/13326_2015_12_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6670/4429421/3151ae278480/13326_2015_12_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6670/4429421/ce253d24fa24/13326_2015_12_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6670/4429421/a0a4e9c5c7a2/13326_2015_12_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Semantic enrichment of longitudinal clinical study data using the CDISC standards and the semantic statistics vocabularies.使用CDISC标准和语义统计词汇对纵向临床研究数据进行语义丰富。
J Biomed Semantics. 2015 Apr 9;6:16. doi: 10.1186/s13326-015-0012-6. eCollection 2015.
2
AlzPharm: integration of neurodegeneration data using RDF.阿尔茨海默病药物研发:使用资源描述框架(RDF)整合神经退行性变数据。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 May 9;8 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-S3-S4.
3
YeastHub: a semantic web use case for integrating data in the life sciences domain.酵母中心:生命科学领域数据整合的语义网用例。
Bioinformatics. 2005 Jun;21 Suppl 1:i85-96. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1026.
4
A Querying Method over RDF-ized Health Level Seven v2.5 Messages Using Life Science Knowledge Resources.基于生命科学知识库的 RDF 化 HL7 v2.5 消息查询方法
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Apr 5;4(2):e12. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5275.
5
NBDC RDF portal: a comprehensive repository for semantic data in life sciences.NBDC RDF 门户:生命科学中语义数据的综合知识库。
Database (Oxford). 2018 Jan 1;2018:bay123. doi: 10.1093/database/bay123.
6
The ChEMBL database as linked open data.ChEMBL 数据库作为链接开放数据。
J Cheminform. 2013 May 8;5(1):23. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-5-23.
7
Providing semantic interoperability between clinical care and clinical research domains.在临床护理和临床研究领域提供语义互操作性。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2013 Mar;17(2):356-69. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2012.2219552. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
8
Implementation of linked data in the life sciences at BioHackathon 2011.2011年生物黑客马拉松上生命科学领域关联数据的应用
J Biomed Semantics. 2015 Jan 7;6:3. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-6-3. eCollection 2015.
9
SAFE: SPARQL Federation over RDF Data Cubes with Access Control.SAFE:具有访问控制的基于RDF数据立方体的SPARQL联邦。
J Biomed Semantics. 2017 Feb 1;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13326-017-0112-6.
10
Towards achieving semantic interoperability of clinical study data with FHIR.朝着实现临床研究数据与FHIR的语义互操作性迈进。
J Biomed Semantics. 2017 Sep 19;8(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13326-017-0148-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Fully connecting the Observational Health Data Science and Informatics (OHDSI) initiative with the world of linked open data.将观察性健康数据科学与信息学(OHDSI)计划与关联开放数据领域全面连接起来。
Genomics Inform. 2019 Jun;17(2):e13. doi: 10.5808/GI.2019.17.2.e13. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
2
Integrating terminologies into standard SQL: a new approach for research on routine data.将术语整合到标准SQL中:一种用于常规数据研究的新方法。
J Biomed Semantics. 2019 Apr 24;10(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13326-019-0199-z.
3
From Matrices to Knowledge: Using Semantic Networks to Annotate the Connectome.

本文引用的文献

1
The linked medical data access control framework.关联医疗数据访问控制框架
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Aug;50:213-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
2
Enabling a multidisciplinary approach to the study of ageing and Alzheimer's disease: an update from the Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study.实现衰老和阿尔茨海默病研究的多学科方法:来自澳大利亚成像生物标志物和生活方式(AIBL)研究的最新进展。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;25(6):699-710. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2013.870136.
3
The ChEMBL database as linked open data.
从矩阵到知识:利用语义网络注释连接组
Front Neuroanat. 2018 Dec 7;12:111. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2018.00111. eCollection 2018.
4
Comparison and transformation between CDISC ODM and EN13606 EHR standards in connecting EHR data with clinical trial research data.在将电子健康记录(EHR)数据与临床试验研究数据相连接方面,CDISC ODM与EN13606 EHR标准之间的比较与转换
Digit Health. 2018 May 17;4:2055207618777676. doi: 10.1177/2055207618777676. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
5
Towards achieving semantic interoperability of clinical study data with FHIR.朝着实现临床研究数据与FHIR的语义互操作性迈进。
J Biomed Semantics. 2017 Sep 19;8(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13326-017-0148-7.
6
Extending XNAT Platform with an Incremental Semantic Framework.使用增量语义框架扩展XNAT平台。
Front Neuroinform. 2017 Aug 31;11:57. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2017.00057. eCollection 2017.
7
Knowledge Representation and Management: a Linked Data Perspective.知识表示与管理:关联数据视角
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):178-183. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-022.
ChEMBL 数据库作为链接开放数据。
J Cheminform. 2013 May 8;5(1):23. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-5-23.
4
Providing semantic interoperability between clinical care and clinical research domains.在临床护理和临床研究领域提供语义互操作性。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2013 Mar;17(2):356-69. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2012.2219552. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
5
Deficiencies in the transfer and availability of clinical trials evidence: a review of existing systems and standards.临床试验证据传递和可用性的不足:现有系统和标准的回顾。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Sep 4;12:95. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-95.
6
Using Australian medicines terminology (AMT) and SNOMED CT-AU to better support clinical research.使用澳大利亚药品术语(AMT)和澳大利亚版医学系统命名法(SNOMED CT-AU)以更好地支持临床研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;178:144-9.
7
Open PHACTS: semantic interoperability for drug discovery.Open PHACTS:药物发现的语义互操作性。
Drug Discov Today. 2012 Nov;17(21-22):1188-98. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.05.016. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
8
Open clinical trial data for all? A view from regulators.公开所有临床试验数据?监管者的观点。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(4):e1001202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001202. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
9
Mapping the Queensland Health iPharmacy Medication File to the Australian Medicines Terminology Using Snapper.使用Snapper将昆士兰卫生i药房药物文件映射到澳大利亚药品术语表。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;168:104-16.
10
On selecting a clinical trial management system for large scale, multi-centre, multi-modal clinical research study.关于为大规模、多中心、多模式临床研究选择临床试验管理系统。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;168:89-95.