Vyas Kaetan J, Danz David, Gilman Robert H, Wise Robert A, León-Velarde Fabiola, Miranda J Jaime, Checkley William
1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland.
2 Biomedical Research Unit, A.B. PRISMA , Lima, Peru .
High Alt Med Biol. 2015 Jun;16(2):162-8. doi: 10.1089/ham.2015.0026. Epub 2015 May 14.
Vyas, Kaetan J., David Danz, Robert H. Gilman, Robert A. Wise, Fabiola León-Velarde, J. Jaime Miranda, and William Checkley. Noninvasive assessment of excessive erythrocytosis as a screening method for chronic mountain sickness at high altitude. High Alt Med Biol 16:162-168, 2015.--Globally, over 140 million people are at risk of developing chronic mountain sickness, a common maladaptation to life at high altitude (>2500 meters above sea level). The diagnosis is contingent upon the identification of excessive erythrocytosis (EE). Current best practices to identify EE require a venous blood draw, which is cumbersome for large-scale surveillance. We evaluated two point-of-care biomarkers to screen for EE: noninvasive spot-check tests of total hemoglobin and oxyhemoglobin saturation (Pronto-7, Masimo Corporation). We conducted paired evaluations of total serum hemoglobin from a venous blood draw and noninvasive, spot-check testing of total hemoglobin and oxyhemoglobin saturation with the Pronto-7 in 382 adults aged ≥35 years living in Puno, Peru (3825 meters above sea level). We used the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement between the noninvasive hemoglobin assessment and the gold standard lab hemoglobin analyzer. Mean age was 58.8 years and 47% were male. The Pronto-7 test was unsuccessful in 21 (5%) participants. Limits of agreement between total hemoglobin measured via venous blood draw and the noninvasive, spot-check test ranged from -2.8 g/dL (95% CI -3.0 to -2.5) to 2.5 g/dL (95% CI 2.2 to 2.7), with a bias of -0.2 g/dL (95% CI -0.3 to -0.02) for the difference between total hemoglobin and noninvasive hemoglobin concentrations. Overall, the noninvasive spot-check test of total hemoglobin had a better area under the receiver operating characteristic curve compared to oxyhemoglobin saturation for the identification of EE as measured by a gold standard laboratory hemoglobin analyzer (0.96 vs. 0.82; p<0.001). Best cut-off values to screen for EE with the Pronto 7 were ≥19.9 g/dL in males and ≥17.5 g/dL in females. At these cut-points, sensitivity and specificity were both 92% and 89% for males and females, respectively. A noninvasive, spot-check test of total hemoglobin had low bias and high discrimination for the detection of EE in high altitude Peru, and may be a useful point-of-care tool for large-scale surveillance in high-altitude settings.
维亚斯,凯坦·J.,大卫·丹兹,罗伯特·H.吉尔曼,罗伯特·A.怀斯,法比奥拉·莱昂 - 贝拉尔代,J.海梅·米兰达,以及威廉·切克利。将红细胞增多症作为高海拔地区慢性高山病筛查方法的无创评估。《高海拔医学与生物学》16:162 - 168,2015年。——在全球范围内,超过1.4亿人有患慢性高山病的风险,这是一种对高海拔(海拔超过2500米)生活常见的适应不良。诊断取决于对红细胞增多症(EE)的识别。目前识别EE的最佳做法需要采集静脉血,这对于大规模监测来说很麻烦。我们评估了两种即时检测生物标志物以筛查EE:总血红蛋白和氧合血红蛋白饱和度的无创即时检测(Pronto - 7,Masimo公司)。我们对秘鲁普诺(海拔3825米)382名年龄≥35岁的成年人进行了配对评估,包括静脉血采集的总血清血红蛋白以及使用Pronto - 7对总血红蛋白和氧合血红蛋白饱和度进行的无创即时检测。我们使用布兰德 - 奥特曼方法来测量无创血红蛋白评估与金标准实验室血红蛋白分析仪之间的一致性。平均年龄为58.8岁,47%为男性。21名(5%)参与者的Pronto - 7检测未成功。通过静脉血采集测量的总血红蛋白与无创即时检测之间的一致性界限范围为 - 2.8 g/dL(95%置信区间 - 3.0至 - 2.5)至2.5 g/dL(95%置信区间2.2至2.7),总血红蛋白与无创血红蛋白浓度之差的偏差为 - 0.2 g/dL(95%置信区间 - 0.3至 - 0.02)。总体而言,对于通过金标准实验室血红蛋白分析仪测量识别EE,总血红蛋白的无创即时检测在受试者工作特征曲线下的面积比氧合血红蛋白饱和度更好(0.96对0.82;p<0.001)。使用Pronto 7筛查EE的最佳截断值男性为≥19.9 g/dL,女性为≥17.5 g/dL。在这些切点处,男性和女性的敏感性和特异性分别均为92%和89%。在秘鲁高海拔地区,总血红蛋白的无创即时检测在检测EE方面偏差低且区分度高,可能是高海拔地区大规模监测的一种有用的即时检测工具。