Schalinski Inga, Schauer Maggie, Elbert Thomas
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany;
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 May 13;6:25652. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.25652. eCollection 2015.
The evolutionary model of the defense cascade by Schauer and Elbert (2010) provides a theoretical frame for a short interview to assess problems underlying and leading to the dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder. Based on known characteristics of the defense stages "fright," "flag," and "faint," we designed a structured interview to assess the vulnerability for the respective types of dissociation. Most of the scales that assess dissociative phenomena are designed as self-report questionnaires. Their items are usually selected based on more heuristic considerations rather than a theoretical model and thus include anything from minor dissociative experiences to major pathological dissociation. The shutdown dissociation scale (Shut-D) was applied in several studies in patients with a history of multiple traumatic events and different disorders that have been shown previously to be prone to symptoms of dissociation. The goal of the present investigation was to obtain psychometric characteristics of the Shut-D (including factor structure, internal consistency, retest reliability, predictive, convergent and criterion-related concurrent validity). A total population of 225 patients and 68 healthy controls were accessed. Shut-D appears to have sufficient internal reliability, excellent retest reliability, high convergent validity, and satisfactory predictive validity, while the summed score of the scale reliably separates patients with exposure to trauma (in different diagnostic groups) from healthy controls. The Shut-D is a brief structured interview for assessing the vulnerability to dissociate as a consequence of exposure to traumatic stressors. The scale demonstrates high-quality psychometric properties and may be useful for researchers and clinicians in assessing shutdown dissociation as well as in predicting the risk of dissociative responding.
绍尔和埃尔伯特(2010年)提出的防御级联进化模型为简短访谈提供了理论框架,以评估创伤后应激障碍解离亚型潜在的和导致该亚型的问题。基于防御阶段“惊吓”“标记”和“昏厥”的已知特征,我们设计了一个结构化访谈,以评估各种解离类型的易感性。大多数评估解离现象的量表被设计为自陈问卷。其项目通常基于更多启发式考量而非理论模型进行选择,因此涵盖了从小的解离体验到严重病理性解离的各种情况。关机解离量表(Shut-D)已在多项针对有多次创伤事件史的患者以及先前已证明易出现解离症状的不同疾病患者的研究中应用。本研究的目的是获得Shut-D的心理测量特征(包括因子结构、内部一致性、重测信度、预测性、收敛性和与标准相关的同时效度)。共纳入了225名患者和68名健康对照。Shut-D似乎具有足够的内部信度、出色的重测信度、高收敛效度和令人满意的预测效度,而该量表的总分能可靠地将遭受创伤的患者(不同诊断组)与健康对照区分开来。Shut-D是一个简短的结构化访谈,用于评估因暴露于创伤性应激源而产生解离的易感性。该量表显示出高质量的心理测量特性,可能对研究人员和临床医生评估关机解离以及预测解离反应风险有用。