• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于电子健康记录的医院患者最佳实践出院检查表的开发与评估

Development and evaluation of an electronic health record-based best-practice discharge checklist for hospital patients.

作者信息

Garg Trit, Lee Jonathan Y, Evans Kambria H, Chen Jonathan, Shieh Lisa

机构信息

Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Mar;41(3):126-31. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41017-7.

DOI:10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41017-7
PMID:25977128
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Checklists may help reduce discharge errors; however, current paper checklists have limited functionality. In 2013 a best-practice discharge checklist using the electronic health record (EHR) was developed and evaluated at Stanford University Medical Center (Stanford, California) in a cluster randomized trial to evaluate its usage, user satisfaction, and impact on physicians' work flow.

METHODS

The study was divided into four phases.

RESULTS

In Phase I, on the survey (N = 76), most of the participants (54.0%) reported using memory to remember discharge tasks. On a 0-100 scale, perception of checklists as being useful was strong (mean, 66.4; standard deviation [SD], 21.2), as was interest in EHR checklists (64.5, 26.6). In Phase II, the checklist consisted of 15 tasks categorized by admission, hospitalization, and discharge-planning. In Phase III, the checklist was implemented as an EHR "smart-phrase" allowing for automatic insertion. In Phase IV, in a trial with 60 participating physicians, 23 EHR checklist users reported higher usage than 12 paper users (28.5 versus 7.67, p = .019), as well as higher checklist integration with work flow (22.6 versus 1.67, p = .014), usefulness of checklist (33.7 versus. 8.92, p = .041), discharge confidence (30.8 versus 5.00, p = .029), and discharge efficiency (25.5 versus 6.67, p = .056). Increasing EHR checklist use was correlated with usefulness ( r = .85, p < .001), confidence (r = .81, p < .001), and efficiency (r = .87, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The EHR checklist reminded physicians to complete discharge tasks, improved confidence, and increased process efficiency. This is the first study to show that medicine residents use "memory" as the most common method for remembering discharge tasks. These data reinforce the need for a formalized tool, such as a checklist, that residents can rely on to complete important discharge tasks.

摘要

背景

清单可能有助于减少出院错误;然而,目前的纸质清单功能有限。2013年,斯坦福大学医学中心(加利福尼亚州斯坦福)开发并在一项整群随机试验中评估了一种使用电子健康记录(EHR)的最佳实践出院清单,以评估其使用情况、用户满意度以及对医生工作流程的影响。

方法

该研究分为四个阶段。

结果

在第一阶段,在调查中(N = 76),大多数参与者(54.0%)报告使用记忆来记住出院任务。在0至100的量表上,对清单有用性的感知很强(均值为66.4;标准差[SD]为21.2),对电子健康记录清单的兴趣也很强(64.5,26.6)。在第二阶段,清单由15项任务组成,按入院、住院和出院计划进行分类。在第三阶段,清单作为一个电子健康记录“智能短语”实施,允许自动插入。在第四阶段,在一项有60名参与医生的试验中,23名电子健康记录清单用户报告的使用频率高于12名纸质清单用户(28.5对7.67,p = 0.019),清单与工作流程的整合度也更高(22.6对1.67,p = 0.014),清单的有用性更高(33.7对8.92,p = 0.041),出院信心更强(30.8对5.00,p = 0.029),出院效率更高(25.5对6.67,p = 0.056)。电子健康记录清单使用的增加与有用性(r = 0.85,p < 0.001)、信心(r = 0.81,p < 0.001)和效率(r = 0.87,p < 0.001)相关。

结论

电子健康记录清单提醒医生完成出院任务,提高了信心,并提高了流程效率。这是第一项表明住院医师将“记忆”作为记住出院任务最常用方法的研究。这些数据强化了对一种正式工具(如清单)的需求,住院医师可以依靠它来完成重要的出院任务。

相似文献

1
Development and evaluation of an electronic health record-based best-practice discharge checklist for hospital patients.基于电子健康记录的医院患者最佳实践出院检查表的开发与评估
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Mar;41(3):126-31. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41017-7.
2
Why Residency Programs Should Not Ignore the Electronic Heath Record after Adoption.为什么住院医师培训项目在采用电子健康记录后不应忽视它。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2019 Oct 1;16(Fall):1d. eCollection 2019 Fall.
3
Interactive Digital Health Tools to Engage Patients and Caregivers in Discharge Preparation: Implementation Study.用于让患者和护理人员参与出院准备的交互式数字健康工具:实施研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 28;22(4):e15573. doi: 10.2196/15573.
4
Evaluation of electronic health record-integrated digital health tools to engage hospitalized patients in discharge preparation.评估电子健康记录集成的数字健康工具,以促使住院患者参与出院准备。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 18;28(4):704-712. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa321.
5
Characterizing electronic health record usage patterns of inpatient medicine residents using event log data.使用事件日志数据刻画内科住院医师的电子健康记录使用模式。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 6;14(2):e0205379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205379. eCollection 2019.
6
Satisfaction and perceived usefulness with newly-implemented Electronic Health Records System among pediatricians at a university hospital.某大学附属医院儿科医生对新实施的电子健康记录系统的满意度和感知有用性。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Feb;169:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.12.026. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
7
Successful Resident Engagement in Quality Improvement: The Detroit Medical Center Story.住院医师成功参与质量改进:底特律医疗中心的故事
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 May;8(2):214-8. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00316.1.
8
Electronic health record in the internal medicine clinic of a Brazilian university hospital: Expectations and satisfaction of physicians and patients.巴西一家大学医院内科诊所的电子健康记录:医生和患者的期望与满意度
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jun;102:80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
9
Interventions to increase physician efficiency and comfort with an electronic health record system.提高医生使用电子健康记录系统的效率和舒适度的干预措施。
Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(1):103-9. doi: 10.3414/ME14-01-0047. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
10
An Iterative Quality Improvement Process Improves Pediatric Ward Discharge Efficiency.迭代式质量改进流程可提高儿科病房出院效率。
Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Mar;10(3):214-221. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2019-0158. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Does autotext usage decrease documentation time among resident physicians? A retrospective analysis of electronic health record usage data.自动文本使用是否会减少住院医师的文档记录时间?电子健康记录使用数据的回顾性分析。
JAMIA Open. 2025 May 28;8(3):ooaf042. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf042. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Effect of a Discharge Checklist in the Emergency Department on Physicians' Satisfaction, Time Management, and Confidence: A Cross-Sectional Study.急诊科出院检查表对医生满意度、时间管理和信心的影响:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2025 Apr 7;17(4):e81842. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81842. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Challenges and Burdens in the Coronary Artery Disease Care Pathway for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Contemporary Narrative Review.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的冠状动脉疾病护理路径中的挑战和负担:当代叙事性综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 25;20(9):5633. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095633.
4
Examining Pediatric Resident Electronic Health Records Use During Prerounding: Mixed Methods Observational Study.检查儿科住院医师在预查房期间对电子健康记录的使用情况:混合方法观察性研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 May 10;9:e38079. doi: 10.2196/38079.
5
Usability challenges with electronic health records (EHRs) during prerounding on pediatric inpatients.儿科住院患者查房前使用电子健康记录(EHRs)时的可用性挑战。
JAMIA Open. 2022 Mar 8;5(1):ooac018. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac018. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
The Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: Prospective, Single-Center, Pre-Post Study.多学科电子出院准备工具的有效性:前瞻性、单中心、前后对照研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Nov 8;8(4):e27568. doi: 10.2196/27568.
7
Improving Early Discharges With an Electronic Health Record Discharge Optimization Tool.使用电子健康记录出院优化工具改善早期出院情况。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 May 18;5(3):e301. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000301. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
8
Investigating discharge communication for chronic disease patients in three hospitals in India.调查印度三家医院的慢性病患者出院沟通情况。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 15;15(4):e0230438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230438. eCollection 2020.
9
A meta-model for computer executable dynamic clinical safety checklists.计算机可执行的动态临床安全检查表的元模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0551-0.
10
Hospital-Based Physicians' Intubation Decisions and Associated Mental Models when Managing a Critically and Terminally Ill Older Patient.基于医院的医师在处理危急和终末期老年患者时的插管决策及其相关心理模型。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Apr;38(3):344-354. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17738958. Epub 2017 Nov 22.