• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用适应降低驾驶评估和研究中的模拟器晕动症。

The use of adaptation to reduce simulator sickness in driving assessment and research.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Apr;53:127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.039. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.039
PMID:23416680
Abstract

The technical advancement of driving simulators has decreased their cost and increased both their accuracy and fidelity. This makes them a useful tool for examining driving behavior in risky or unique situations. With the approaching increase of older licensed drivers due to aging of the baby boomers, driving simulators will be important for conducting driving research and evaluations for older adults. With these simulator technologies, some people may experience significant effects of a unique form of motion sickness, known as simulator sickness. These effects may be more pronounced in older adults. The present study examined the feasibility of an intervention to attenuate symptoms of simulator sickness in drivers participating in a study of a driving evaluation protocol. Prior to beginning the experiment, the experimental groups did not differ in subjective simulator sickness scores as indicated by Revised Simulator Sickness Questionnaire scores (all p>0.5). Participants who experienced a two-day delay between an initial acclimation to the driving simulator and the driving session experienced fewer simulator sickness symptoms as indicated by RSSQ total severity scores than participants who did not receive a two-day delay (F(1,88)=4.54, p=.036, partial η(2)=.049). These findings have implications for improving client well-being and potentially increasing acceptance of driving simulation for driving evaluations and for driving safety research.

摘要

驾驶模拟器技术的进步降低了其成本,同时提高了其准确性和逼真度。这使得它们成为研究危险或特殊情况下驾驶行为的有用工具。随着婴儿潮一代的老龄化,越来越多的老年持照驾驶员即将出现,驾驶模拟器对于进行老年人驾驶研究和评估将变得非常重要。随着这些模拟器技术的发展,一些人可能会出现一种独特形式的运动病,即模拟器病,产生显著的影响。这些影响在老年人中可能更为明显。本研究探讨了一种干预措施的可行性,以减轻参与驾驶评估协议研究的驾驶员的模拟器病症状。在开始实验之前,实验组的主观模拟器病评分(如修订后的模拟器病问卷评分所示)没有差异(所有 p>0.5)。与没有接受两天延迟的参与者相比,在驾驶模拟器初次适应和驾驶阶段之间经历两天延迟的参与者的模拟器病症状更少(F(1,88)=4.54,p=.036,偏η²=.049)。这些发现对于改善客户的健康状况并可能增加对驾驶模拟评估和驾驶安全研究的接受度具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
The use of adaptation to reduce simulator sickness in driving assessment and research.运用适应降低驾驶评估和研究中的模拟器晕动症。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Apr;53:127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.039. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
2
Simulator sickness during driving simulation studies.驾驶模拟研究中的模拟器晕动症。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 May;42(3):788-96. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.013.
3
The effects of simulated fog and motion on simulator sickness in a driving simulator and the duration of after-effects.模拟雾和运动对驾驶模拟器中晕动病的影响及后效持续时间。
Appl Ergon. 2014 May;45(3):406-12. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 May 31.
4
Effectiveness evaluation of simulative workshops for newly licensed drivers.新领证驾驶员模拟驾驶培训效果评估
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Feb;63:30-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.018. Epub 2013 Oct 19.
5
Correlates of military tank simulator sickness.军用坦克模拟器晕动症的相关因素
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1993 Jul;64(7):619-22.
6
Exploring the Participant-Related Determinants of Simulator Sickness in a Physical Motion Car Rollover Simulation as Measured by the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire.探究物理运动汽车翻车模拟中参与者相关因素对模拟器晕动症的影响,采用模拟器晕动症问卷进行测量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 26;17(19):7044. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197044.
7
Dropout during a driving simulator study: A survival analysis.驾驶模拟器研究中的失访:一项生存分析。
J Safety Res. 2015 Dec;55:159-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
8
Long-term study of simulator sickness: differences in EEG response due to individual sensitivity.模拟器疾病的长期研究:个体敏感性导致的脑电图反应差异。
Int J Neurosci. 2008 Jun;118(6):857-65. doi: 10.1080/00207450701239459.
9
Slower adaptation to driving simulator and simulator sickness in older adults.老年人对驾驶模拟器的适应速度较慢,且更容易出现模拟器晕动病。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012 Jun;24(3):285-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03325260.
10
Optical correction reduces simulator sickness in a driving environment.光学矫正可减轻驾驶环境中的模拟器不适症状。
Hum Factors. 2014 Dec;56(8):1472-81. doi: 10.1177/0018720814533992.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of within-day intervals on adaptation to visually induced motion sickness in a virtual-reality motorcycling simulator.日内时间间隔对虚拟现实摩托车模拟器中视觉诱发晕动病适应的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 22;14(1):21302. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71526-9.
2
VR Sickness Adaptation With Ramped Optic Flow Transfers From Abstract To Realistic Environments.通过从抽象环境到现实环境的渐变光流转移实现虚拟现实晕动症适应
Front Virtual Real. 2022 May;3. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2022.848001. Epub 2022 May 23.
3
Evaluation of Driver's Reaction Time Measured in Driving Simulator.
驾驶模拟器中驾驶员反应时间的评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 6;22(9):3542. doi: 10.3390/s22093542.
4
The Visually Induced Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire (VIMSSQ): Estimating Individual Susceptibility to Motion Sickness-Like Symptoms When Using Visual Devices.视诱导运动病易感性问卷(VIMSSQ):评估使用视觉设备时出现运动病样症状的个体易感性。
Hum Factors. 2023 Feb;65(1):107-124. doi: 10.1177/00187208211008687. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
5
Virtual Reality Is Sexist: But It Does Not Have to Be.虚拟现实存在性别歧视:但并非必然如此。
Front Robot AI. 2020 Jan 31;7:4. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00004. eCollection 2020.
6
Joint and individual effectiveness of galvanic cutaneous stimulation and tactile stimulation at decreasing Simulator Adaptation Syndrome.电刺激和触觉刺激联合及单独应用对降低模拟适应综合征的效果。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240627. eCollection 2020.
7
Exploring the Participant-Related Determinants of Simulator Sickness in a Physical Motion Car Rollover Simulation as Measured by the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire.探究物理运动汽车翻车模拟中参与者相关因素对模拟器晕动症的影响,采用模拟器晕动症问卷进行测量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 26;17(19):7044. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197044.
8
The Drives for Driving Simulation: A Scientometric Analysis and a Selective Review of Reviews on Simulated Driving Research.驾驶模拟的驱动因素:科学计量分析与模拟驾驶研究综述的选择性回顾
Front Psychol. 2020 May 27;11:917. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00917. eCollection 2020.
9
The Impact of Alcohol Hangover on Simulated Driving Performance During a 'Commute to Work'-Zero and Residual Alcohol Effects Compared.酒精宿醉对模拟“通勤上班”驾驶表现的影响——零酒精效应与残余酒精效应对比
J Clin Med. 2020 May 12;9(5):1435. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051435.
10
Can Simulator Sickness Be Avoided? A Review on Temporal Aspects of Simulator Sickness.模拟器晕动症可以避免吗?关于模拟器晕动症时间因素的综述
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 6;9:2132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02132. eCollection 2018.