Adelhelm Philipp, Hartmann Pascal, Bender Conrad L, Busche Martin, Eufinger Christine, Janek Juergen
Institute for Technical Chemistry and Environmental Chemistry, Center for Energy and Environmental Chemistry, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Lessingstraße 12, 07743 Jena, Germany ; Institute of Physical Chemistry, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 58, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Institute of Physical Chemistry, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 58, 35392 Giessen, Germany ; BASF SE, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2015 Apr 23;6:1016-55. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.6.105. eCollection 2015.
Research devoted to room temperature lithium-sulfur (Li/S8) and lithium-oxygen (Li/O2) batteries has significantly increased over the past ten years. The race to develop such cell systems is mainly motivated by the very high theoretical energy density and the abundance of sulfur and oxygen. The cell chemistry, however, is complex, and progress toward practical device development remains hampered by some fundamental key issues, which are currently being tackled by numerous approaches. Quite surprisingly, not much is known about the analogous sodium-based battery systems, although the already commercialized, high-temperature Na/S8 and Na/NiCl2 batteries suggest that a rechargeable battery based on sodium is feasible on a large scale. Moreover, the natural abundance of sodium is an attractive benefit for the development of batteries based on low cost components. This review provides a summary of the state-of-the-art knowledge on lithium-sulfur and lithium-oxygen batteries and a direct comparison with the analogous sodium systems. The general properties, major benefits and challenges, recent strategies for performance improvements and general guidelines for further development are summarized and critically discussed. In general, the substitution of lithium for sodium has a strong impact on the overall properties of the cell reaction and differences in ion transport, phase stability, electrode potential, energy density, etc. can be thus expected. Whether these differences will benefit a more reversible cell chemistry is still an open question, but some of the first reports on room temperature Na/S8 and Na/O2 cells already show some exciting differences as compared to the established Li/S8 and Li/O2 systems.
在过去十年中,致力于室温锂硫(Li/S8)和锂氧(Li/O2)电池的研究显著增加。开发此类电池系统的竞争主要源于其极高的理论能量密度以及硫和氧的丰富储量。然而,电池化学过程复杂,实际器件开发进展仍受一些基本关键问题的阻碍,目前众多方法正在解决这些问题。颇为令人惊讶的是,尽管已商业化的高温Na/S8和Na/NiCl2电池表明基于钠的可充电电池在大规模应用上是可行的,但对于类似的钠基电池系统人们了解并不多。此外,钠的天然丰度对于开发基于低成本组件的电池来说是一个有吸引力的优势。本综述总结了锂硫和锂氧电池的最新知识,并与类似的钠系统进行了直接比较。总结并批判性地讨论了这些电池的一般性质、主要优点和挑战、近期性能改进策略以及进一步发展的一般指导方针。总体而言,用钠替代锂会对电池反应的整体性质产生强烈影响,因此可以预期在离子传输、相稳定性、电极电位、能量密度等方面会存在差异。这些差异是否会有利于实现更可逆的电池化学过程仍是一个悬而未决的问题,但一些关于室温Na/S8和Na/O2电池的初步报告已经显示出与成熟的Li/S8和Li/O2系统相比存在一些令人兴奋的差异。