Suppr超能文献

对焦虑、易怒和敌对性抑郁的重新评估。

Anxious, irritable and hostile depression re-appraised.

作者信息

Parker Gordon B, Graham Rebecca K

机构信息

School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2015 Aug 15;182:91-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.04.041. Epub 2015 May 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While classification of the depression disorders currently favors a dimensional model, this study considered the empirical support for a spectrum model linking personality with phenotypic depressive features, specifically examining patients with 'irritable', 'hostile' and 'anxious' depression.

METHODS

Pearson correlations were performed for Temperament and Personality (T&P) scales and state depressive patterns (irritable, hostile and anxious) for patients clinically diagnosed with unipolar melancholic and non-melancholic depressive conditions.

RESULTS

Irritable depression was most strongly associated with T&P irritability and anxious depression with T&P anxious-worrying - although these associations lacked specificity and were also correlated with other T&P scales. Hostile depression was most strongly correlated with T&P irritability suggesting that hostile and irritable depression are synonymous patterns. There were no clear indications for more distinct associations for the non-melancholic, compared to the melancholic, subset.

LIMITATIONS

Study findings are limited in that measures of state depressive patterns were relatively minimalistic and assignment to melancholic and non-melancholic conditions was measured by clinician judgment and may be subjective in nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings offer little support in the positioning of anxious and irritable/hostile depression as meaningfully differing patterns, nor for the spectrum model being more specific to the non-melancholic depressive conditions. There would appear to be little utility in preserving these depressive patterns as diagnostic constructs.

摘要

背景

虽然目前抑郁症的分类倾向于维度模型,但本研究考虑了将人格与表型抑郁特征联系起来的谱系模型的实证支持,特别研究了“易激惹性”、“敌意性”和“焦虑性”抑郁症患者。

方法

对临床诊断为单相抑郁性和非抑郁性抑郁状态的患者,进行气质与人格(T&P)量表与状态抑郁模式(易激惹性、敌意性和焦虑性)的Pearson相关性分析。

结果

易激惹性抑郁症与T&P易激惹性最强相关,焦虑性抑郁症与T&P焦虑担忧最强相关——尽管这些关联缺乏特异性,且也与其他T&P量表相关。敌意性抑郁症与T&P易激惹性相关性最强,表明敌意性和易激惹性抑郁症是同义模式。与抑郁性亚组相比,非抑郁性亚组没有明显迹象表明存在更明显的关联。

局限性

研究结果有限,因为状态抑郁模式的测量相对简单,且抑郁性和非抑郁性状态的划分是由临床医生判断的,可能具有主观性。

结论

研究结果几乎无法支持将焦虑性和易激惹性/敌意性抑郁症定位为有意义的不同模式,也无法支持谱系模型对非抑郁性抑郁状态更具特异性的观点。将这些抑郁模式保留为诊断结构似乎没有什么用处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验