Suppr超能文献

用于糖尿病诊断和监测的果糖胺测量:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案

Fructosamine measurement for diabetes mellitus diagnosis and monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

作者信息

Nansseu Jobert Richie N, Fokom-Domgue Joël, Noubiap Jean Jacques N, Balti Eric V, Sobngwi Eugène, Kengne André Pascal

机构信息

Sickle Cell Disease Unit, Mother and Child Centre, Chantal Biya Foundation, Yaoundé, Centre Region, Cameroon Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Biomedical Sciences of the University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Centre Region, Cameroon.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Biomedical Sciences of the University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Centre Region, Cameroon.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2015 May 15;5(5):e007689. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007689.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Fructosamine is a marker of glucose control reflecting the average glycaemic level over the preceding 2-3 weeks. Fructosamine has not gained as much popularity as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) for diabetes mellitus (DM) control monitoring, and the related underlying reasons remain unclear. We aim to search for and summarise available evidence on the accuracy of fructosamine measurements to diagnose and monitor DM.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This systematic review will include randomised control trials, controlled before-and-after studies, time series designs, cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional surveys reporting the diagnosis and/or monitoring of DM (type 1 DM, type 2 DM and gestational DM) with fructosamine compared with other measures of glycaemia (fasting glucose, oral glucose tolerance test, random glucose, HbA1c), without any language restriction. We will perform electronic searches in PubMed, Scopus and other databases, supplemented with manual searches. Articles published from 1 January 1980 to 30 June 2015 will be eligible for inclusion in this review. Two authors will independently screen, select studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias with discrepancies resolved by consensus. We will assess clinical heterogeneity by examining the types of interventions and outcomes in each study, and pool studies judged to be clinically homogeneous. We will also assess statistical heterogeneity using the χ(2) test of homogeneity and quantify it using the I(2) statistic. Absolute accuracy measures (sensitivity, specificity) will be pooled in a bivariate random-effects model, allowing for intersetting variability. Negative and positive predictive values will be computed for fructosamine, compared with another measure of glycaemia from the pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity, using Bayes' theorem.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This systematic review will use data from published studies and does not require ethics approval. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO (ID=CRD42015015930).

摘要

引言

果糖胺是反映前2 - 3周平均血糖水平的血糖控制指标。在糖尿病(DM)控制监测中,果糖胺不如糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)那样广受欢迎,其相关潜在原因尚不清楚。我们旨在寻找并总结关于果糖胺测量用于诊断和监测DM准确性的现有证据。

方法与分析

本系统评价将纳入随机对照试验、前后对照研究、时间序列设计、队列研究、病例对照研究和横断面调查,这些研究报告了与其他血糖测量指标(空腹血糖、口服葡萄糖耐量试验、随机血糖、HbA1c)相比,使用果糖胺诊断和/或监测DM(1型DM、2型DM和妊娠期DM)的情况,且无语言限制。我们将在PubMed、Scopus和其他数据库中进行电子检索,并辅以手工检索。1980年1月1日至2015年6月30日发表的文章将符合纳入本评价的条件。两名作者将独立筛选、选择研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险,如有分歧通过共识解决。我们将通过检查每项研究的干预措施和结局类型来评估临床异质性,并汇总判断为临床同质的研究。我们还将使用χ(2)同质性检验评估统计异质性,并使用I(2)统计量对其进行量化。绝对准确性指标(敏感性、特异性)将汇总在双变量随机效应模型中,以考虑不同研究间的变异性。将使用贝叶斯定理,根据敏感性和特异性的汇总估计值,计算果糖胺与另一种血糖测量指标相比的阴性和阳性预测值。

伦理与传播

本系统评价将使用已发表研究的数据,无需伦理批准。研究结果将发表在同行评审期刊上,并在科学会议上展示。

试验注册号

PROSPERO(编号=CRD42015015930)

相似文献

10

引用本文的文献

3
Estimated average blood glucose level based on fructosamine level.基于果糖胺水平的估算平均血糖水平。
Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Mar 10;67(2):262-265. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000589.
7
Therapy Side Effects in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮的治疗副作用
Curr Health Sci J. 2018 Jul-Sep;44(3):316-321. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.44.03.18. Epub 2018 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

7
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
9
A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.诊断准确性研究的Meta分析模型的统一
Biostatistics. 2007 Apr;8(2):239-51. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxl004. Epub 2006 May 11.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验