Suppr超能文献

内镜下乳头大球囊扩张术与内镜括约肌切开术治疗肝外胆管大结石及多发结石的疗效比较

Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones.

作者信息

Tsuchida Kouhei, Iwasaki Mari, Tsubouchi Misako, Suzuki Tsunehiro, Tsuchida Chieko, Yoshitake Naoto, Sasai Takako, Hiraishi Hideyuki

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu, Shimotsuga, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 May 16;15:59. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0290-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is currently recognized as the primary endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones. However, it is difficult to remove multiple (≥ 3) or large (≥ 15 mm) common bile duct stones with EST alone. Recently, EST plus endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) was reported to be an effective treatment for such bile duct stones. We compared the results of EST and EST + EPLBD for multiple (≥ 3) or large (≥ 15 mm) stones that were difficult to treat using EST alone. We also compared the complication rates between the techniques.

METHODS

Seventy patients with large (largest diameter, ≥ 15 mm) or ≥ 3 common bile duct stones treated in our department between April 2010 and March 2013 underwent EST + EPLBD (n = 34) or EST alone (n = 36). We compared final successful stone removal rates, rates of successful stone removal in the first session, procedure times, status of concurrent mechanical lithotripsy (ML), and complications between the EST + EPLBD and EST groups.

RESULTS

The rates of final successful stone removal were similar between the two groups (EST + EPLBD: 100 % vs. EST: 89 %; p = 0.115). The rate of successful stone removal in the first session was significantly higher in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 88 % vs. EST: 56 %; p = 0.03). Moreover, the procedure time was significantly shorter (EST + EPLBD: 42 min vs. EST: 67 min; p = 0.011) and the rate of ML use was significantly lower in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 50 % vs. EST: 94 %; p < 0.001). Complications like pancreatitis and bleeding occurred in three patients in the EST + EPLBD group and in 10 patients in the EST group, but the differences were not statistically significant (EST + EPLBD: 9 % vs. EST: 25 %; p = 0.112).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that EST + EPLBD is an effective therapy for patients with difficult-to-treat multiple or large common bile duct stones, because it requires fewer sessions and shorter operative times than EST alone.

摘要

背景

内镜括约肌切开术(EST)目前被认为是治疗胆总管结石的主要内镜治疗方法。然而,单独使用EST难以取出多发(≥3枚)或较大(≥15mm)的胆总管结石。最近,有报道称EST联合内镜乳头大球囊扩张术(EPLBD)是治疗此类胆管结石的有效方法。我们比较了EST和EST+EPLBD治疗单独使用EST难以治疗的多发(≥3枚)或较大(≥15mm)结石的效果。我们还比较了两种技术之间的并发症发生率。

方法

2010年4月至2013年3月期间在我科接受治疗的70例患有较大(最大直径≥15mm)或≥3枚胆总管结石的患者接受了EST+EPLBD(n=34)或单独EST(n=36)治疗。我们比较了EST+EPLBD组和EST组的最终结石清除成功率、首次治疗的结石清除成功率、手术时间、同期机械碎石术(ML)的使用情况以及并发症。

结果

两组的最终结石清除成功率相似(EST+EPLBD:100% vs. EST:89%;p=0.115)。EST+EPLBD组首次治疗的结石清除成功率显著更高(EST+EPLBD:88% vs. EST:56%;p=0.03)。此外,EST+EPLBD组的手术时间显著更短(EST+EPLBD:42分钟 vs. EST:67分钟;p=0.011),且ML使用率显著更低(EST+EPLBD:50% vs. EST:94%;p<0.001)。EST+EPLBD组有3例患者发生胰腺炎和出血并发症,EST组有10例患者发生,但差异无统计学意义(EST+EPLBD:9% vs. EST:25%;p=0.112)。

结论

我们的结果表明,EST+EPLBD是治疗难以治疗的多发或较大胆总管结石患者的有效疗法,因为与单独使用EST相比,它所需的治疗次数更少,手术时间更短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/887e/4446805/24ef2364dade/12876_2015_290_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验