Verburg Peter H, Koomen Eric, Hilferink Maarten, Pérez-Soba Marta, Lesschen Jan Peter
Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, VU University Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Landsc Ecol. 2012;27(4):473-486. doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9715-6. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
Measures of climate change adaptation often involve modification of land use and land use planning practices. Such changes in land use affect the provision of various ecosystem goods and services. Therefore, it is likely that adaptation measures may result in synergies and trade-offs between a range of ecosystems goods and services. An integrative land use modelling approach is presented to assess such impacts for the European Union. A reference scenario accounts for current trends in global drivers and includes a number of important policy developments that correspond to on-going changes in European policies. The reference scenario is compared to a policy scenario in which a range of measures is implemented to regulate flood risk and protect soils under conditions of climate change. The impacts of the simulated land use dynamics are assessed for four key indicators of ecosystem service provision: flood risk, carbon sequestration, habitat connectivity and biodiversity. The results indicate a large spatial variation in the consequences of the adaptation measures on the provisioning of ecosystem services. Synergies are frequently observed at the location of the measures itself, whereas trade-offs are found at other locations. Reducing land use intensity in specific parts of the catchment may lead to increased pressure in other regions, resulting in trade-offs. Consequently, when aggregating the results to larger spatial scales the positive and negative impacts may be off-set, indicating the need for detailed spatial assessments. The modelled results indicate that for a careful planning and evaluation of adaptation measures it is needed to consider the trade-offs accounting for the negative effects of a measure at locations distant from the actual measure. Integrated land use modelling can help land use planning in such complex trade-off evaluation by providing evidence on synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services, different policy fields and societal demands.
气候变化适应措施通常涉及土地利用和土地利用规划实践的调整。这种土地利用变化会影响各种生态系统产品和服务的供应。因此,适应措施很可能会在一系列生态系统产品和服务之间产生协同效应和权衡取舍。本文提出了一种综合土地利用建模方法,以评估其对欧盟的此类影响。一个参考情景考虑了全球驱动因素的当前趋势,并纳入了一些与欧洲政策正在发生的变化相对应的重要政策发展情况。将该参考情景与一个政策情景进行比较,在政策情景中实施了一系列措施,以在气候变化条件下调节洪水风险和保护土壤。针对生态系统服务供应的四个关键指标评估模拟土地利用动态的影响:洪水风险、碳固存、栖息地连通性和生物多样性。结果表明,适应措施对生态系统服务供应的影响在空间上存在很大差异。在措施实施地点本身经常观察到协同效应,而在其他地点则发现存在权衡取舍。减少集水区特定区域的土地利用强度可能会导致其他区域压力增加,从而产生权衡取舍。因此,当将结果汇总到更大空间尺度时,正负影响可能会相互抵消,这表明需要进行详细的空间评估。模拟结果表明,为了仔细规划和评估适应措施,需要考虑权衡取舍,即考虑一项措施在远离实际措施的地点所产生的负面影响。综合土地利用建模可以通过提供关于生态系统服务、不同政策领域和社会需求之间协同效应和权衡取舍的证据,帮助进行这种复杂权衡评估中的土地利用规划。