Tanner Darren, Bulkes Nyssa Z
Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 4080 Foreign Languages Building, MC-168, 707 S. Mathews Ave., Urbana, 61801, IL, USA.
Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1753-63. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0850-3.
We investigated factors that affect the comprehension of subject-verb agreement in English, using quantification as a window into the relationship between morphosyntactic processes in language production and comprehension. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants read sentences with grammatical and ungrammatical verbs, in which the plurality of the subject noun phrase was either doubly marked (via overt plural quantification and morphological marking on the noun) or singly marked (via only plural morphology on the noun). Both acceptability judgments and the ERP data showed heightened sensitivity to agreement violations when quantification provided an additional cue to the grammatical number of the subject noun phrase, over and above plural morphology. This is consistent with models of grammatical comprehension that emphasize feature prediction in tandem with cue-based memory retrieval. Our results additionally contrast with those of prior studies that showed no effects of plural quantification on agreement in language production. These findings therefore highlight some nontrivial divergences in the cues and mechanisms supporting morphosyntactic processing in language production and comprehension.
我们通过量化这一视角来探究语言产出与理解过程中形态句法之间的关系,以此研究影响英语中主谓一致理解的因素。在参与者阅读包含语法正确和错误动词的句子时,记录其事件相关脑电位(ERP)。其中,主语名词短语的数要么通过双重标记(名词上既有明显的复数量化又有形态标记),要么通过单一标记(仅名词上有复数形态)来体现。可接受性判断和ERP数据均显示,当量化为主语名词短语的语法数提供了除复数形态之外的额外线索时,对一致性违反的敏感度会提高。这与强调特征预测与基于线索的记忆检索相结合的语法理解模型相一致。我们的结果还与之前的研究结果形成对比,之前的研究表明复数量化对语言产出中的一致性没有影响。因此,这些发现凸显了在支持语言产出和理解中形态句法处理的线索和机制方面存在一些显著差异。