Pedersen Trine Pagh, Holstein Bjørn E, Krølner Rikke, Ersbøll Annette Kjær, Jørgensen Thea Suldrup, Aarestrup Anne Kristine, Utter Jennifer, McNaughton Sarah A, Neumark-Stzainer Dianne, Rasmussen Mette
1National Institute of Public Health,University of Southern Denmark,Øster Farimagsgade 5,1353 Copenhagen K,Denmark.
2Centre for Intervention Research in Health Promotion and Disease Prevention,National Institute of Public Health,University of Southern Denmark,Copenhagen,Denmark.
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Apr;19(5):872-84. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015001457. Epub 2015 May 20.
To investigate: (i) how lunch frequency of adolescents varies between schools and between classes within schools; (ii) the associations between frequency of lunch and individual sociodemographic factors and school characteristics; and (iii) if any observed associations between lunch frequency and school characteristics vary by gender and age groups.
Cross-sectional study in which students and school headmasters completed self-administered questionnaires. Associations were estimated by multilevel multivariate logistic regression.
The Danish arm of the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children study 2010.
Students (n 4922) aged 11, 13 and 15 years attending a random sample of seventy-three schools.
The school-level and class-level variations in low lunch frequency were small (intraclass correlation coefficient <2·1 %). At the individual level, low lunch frequency was most common among students who were boys, 13- and 15-year-olds, from medium and low family social class, descendants of immigrants, living in a single-parent family and in a reconstructed family. School-level analyses suggested that having access to a canteen at school was associated with low lunch frequency (OR=1·47; 95% CI 1·14, 1·89). Likewise not having an adult present during lunch breaks was associated with low lunch frequency (OR=1·44; 95% CI 1·18, 1·75). Cross-level interactions suggested that these associations differed by age group.
Lunch frequency among Danish students appears to be largely influenced by sociodemographic factors. Additionally, the presence of an adult during lunch breaks promotes frequent lunch consumption while availability of a canteen may discourage frequent lunch consumption. These findings vary between older and younger students.
调查:(i)青少年的午餐频率在不同学校以及学校内不同班级之间如何变化;(ii)午餐频率与个体社会人口学因素及学校特征之间的关联;以及(iii)观察到的午餐频率与学校特征之间的任何关联是否因性别和年龄组而异。
横断面研究,学生和学校校长完成自填式问卷。通过多水平多变量逻辑回归估计关联。
2010年学龄儿童健康行为研究的丹麦部分。
从73所学校的随机样本中选取的11岁、13岁和15岁的学生(n = 4922)。
低午餐频率在学校层面和班级层面的差异较小(组内相关系数<2.1%)。在个体层面,低午餐频率在男孩、13岁和15岁的学生、来自中低家庭社会阶层、移民后代、生活在单亲家庭和重组家庭中的学生中最为常见。学校层面的分析表明,学校有食堂与低午餐频率相关(比值比=1.47;95%置信区间1.14,1.89)。同样,午餐休息期间没有成年人在场与低午餐频率相关(比值比=1.44;95%置信区间1.18,1.75)。跨水平交互作用表明,这些关联在不同年龄组之间存在差异。
丹麦学生的午餐频率似乎在很大程度上受社会人口学因素影响。此外,午餐休息期间有成年人在场会促进频繁吃午餐,而有食堂则可能抑制频繁吃午餐。这些发现因年龄较大和较小的学生而异。