Worrell Frank C, McKay Michael T, Andretta James R
University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Liverpool John Moores University, UK.
J Adolesc. 2015 Jul;42:128-39. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 May 18.
This paper examined the association between membership in profiles based on a shortened form of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI-S; McKay, Andretta, McGee, & Worrell, 2014) and other temporal and psychosocial variables. Participants consisted of 1620 adolescents attending high school in Northern Ireland. ZTPI-S scores had correlations with other temporal and psychosocial variables that were similar to those reported for ZTPI scores in previous studies. Four ZTPI-S profiles were identified-Balanced, Past Negative, Present Hedonistic, and Future-and results indicated that these profiles had theoretically meaningful relationships with self-esteem, self-efficacy, aggression, parental attachment, consideration of future consequences, and future temporal focus. Unlike studies of college students where the Balanced profile was related to more adaptive functioning, the Future profile was related to more adaptive functioning. Future studies are needed to establish the generalizability of these profiles and to determine if there are developmental differences in which profiles are more adaptive.
本文基于简版的津巴多时间视角问卷(ZTPI-S;麦凯、安德雷塔、麦吉和沃雷尔,2014)研究了不同类型与其他时间及社会心理变量之间的关联。研究对象为北爱尔兰1620名高中生。ZTPI-S得分与其他时间及社会心理变量的相关性,与以往研究中报道的ZTPI得分的相关性相似。研究确定了四种ZTPI-S类型——平衡型、过去消极型、当前享乐型和未来型——结果表明,这些类型与自尊、自我效能感、攻击性、亲子依恋、对未来后果的考虑以及未来时间焦点存在理论上有意义的关系。与大学生研究不同,在大学生研究中平衡型与更具适应性的功能相关,而在本研究中未来型与更具适应性的功能相关。未来需要开展研究以确定这些类型的普遍性,并确定哪些类型更具适应性是否存在发展差异。