Suppr超能文献

采用微生物燃料电池时,电极构型对保留时间和生活污水处理效率的影响。

Impact of electrode configurations on retention time and domestic wastewater treatment efficiency using microbial fuel cells.

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 231Q Sackett Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 231Q Sackett Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

出版信息

Water Res. 2015 Sep 1;80:41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.021. Epub 2015 May 14.

Abstract

Efficient treatment of domestic wastewater under continuous flow conditions using microbial fuel cells (MFCs) requires hydraulic retention times (HRTs) that are similar to or less than those of conventional methods such as activated sludge. Two MFCs in series were compared at theoretical HRTs of 8.8, 4.4 and 2.2 h using two different brush-electrode MFC configurations: a full brush evenly spaced between two cathodes (S2C); and trimmed brush anodes near a single cathode (N1C). The MFCs with two cathodes produced more power than the MFCs with a single cathode, with 1.72 mW for the S2C, compared to and 1.12 mW for the N1C at a set HRT = 4.4 h. The single cathode MFCs with less cathode area removed slightly more COD (54.2 ± 2.3%, N1C) than the two-cathode MFCs (48.3 ± 1.0%, S2C). However, the higher COD removal was due to the longer HRTs measured for the MFCs with the N1C configuration (10.7, 5.3 and 3.1 h) than with the S2C configuration (7.2, 3.7 and 2.2 h), despite the same theoretical HRT. The longer HRTs of the N1C MFCs also resulted in slightly higher coulombic efficiencies (≤37%) than those of the S2C MFCs (≤29%). While the S2C MFC configuration would be more advantageous based on electrical power production, the N1C MFC might be more useful on the basis of capital costs relative to COD removal efficiency due to the use of less cathode surface area per volume of reactor.

摘要

在连续流动条件下,使用微生物燃料电池(MFC)高效处理生活污水需要水力停留时间(HRT)与传统方法(如活性污泥法)相似或更短。在理论 HRT 分别为 8.8、4.4 和 2.2 h 的条件下,比较了串联的两个 MFC,使用了两种不同的刷电极 MFC 构型:在两个阴极之间均匀间隔的全刷(S2C);以及靠近单个阴极的修剪刷阳极(N1C)。具有两个阴极的 MFC 比具有单个阴极的 MFC 产生更多的功率,在设定 HRT = 4.4 h 时,S2C 的功率为 1.72 mW,而 N1C 的功率为 1.12 mW。具有较少阴极面积的单个阴极 MFC 略微去除更多 COD(54.2 ± 2.3%,N1C)比具有两个阴极的 MFC(48.3 ± 1.0%,S2C)。然而,较高的 COD 去除率是由于具有 N1C 构型的 MFC(10.7、5.3 和 3.1 h)的 HRT 比具有 S2C 构型(7.2、3.7 和 2.2 h)更长,尽管理论 HRT 相同。N1C MFC 的较长 HRT 也导致比 S2C MFC 的库仑效率(≤37%)略高(≤29%)。虽然基于电功率生产,S2C MFC 构型会更有利,但由于每个反应器体积使用的阴极表面积较少,基于 COD 去除效率,N1C MFC 可能更有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验