Valdivia Espino Jennifer N, Guerrero Natalie, Rhoads Natalie, Simon Norma-Jean, Escaron Anne L, Meinen Amy, Nieto F Javier, Martinez-Donate Ana P
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 May 21;12:E78. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140455.
Eating in restaurants is associated with high caloric intake. This review summarizes and evaluates the evidence supporting community-based restaurant interventions.
We searched all years of PubMed and Web of Knowledge through January 2014 for original articles describing or evaluating community-based restaurant interventions to promote healthy eating. We extracted summary information and classified the interventions into 9 categories according to the strategies implemented. A scoring system was adapted to evaluate the evidence, assigning 0 to 3 points to each intervention for study design, public awareness, and effectiveness. The average values were summed and then multiplied by 1 to 3 points, according to the volume of research available for each category. These summary scores were used to determine the level of evidence (insufficient, sufficient, or strong) supporting the effectiveness of each category.
This review included 27 interventions described in 25 studies published since 1979. Most interventions took place in exclusively urban areas of the United States, either in the West or the South. The most common intervention categories were the use of point-of-purchase information with promotion and communication (n = 6), and point-of-purchase information with increased availability of healthy choices (n = 6). Only the latter category had sufficient evidence. The remaining 8 categories had insufficient evidence because of interventions showing no, minimal, or mixed findings; limited reporting of awareness and effectiveness; low volume of research; or weak study designs. No intervention reported an average negative impact on outcomes.
Evidence about effective community-based strategies to promote healthy eating in restaurants is limited, especially for interventions in rural areas. To expand the evidence base, more studies should be conducted using robust study designs, standardized evaluation methods, and measures of sales, behavior, and health outcomes.
在餐馆就餐与高热量摄入有关。本综述总结并评估了支持以社区为基础的餐馆干预措施的证据。
我们检索了截至2014年1月的PubMed和Web of Knowledge历年文献,以查找描述或评估以社区为基础的餐馆干预措施以促进健康饮食的原始文章。我们提取了总结信息,并根据实施的策略将干预措施分为9类。采用一种评分系统来评估证据,根据研究设计、公众意识和有效性,为每项干预措施赋予0至3分。将平均值相加,然后根据每类可得的研究数量乘以1至3分。这些总结分数用于确定支持每类有效性的证据水平(不足、充分或有力)。
本综述纳入了自1979年以来发表的25项研究中描述的27项干预措施。大多数干预措施发生在美国的纯城市地区,要么在西部,要么在南部。最常见的干预类别是在购买点提供信息并进行促销和宣传(n = 6),以及在购买点提供信息并增加健康选择的可得性(n = 6)。只有后一类有充分的证据。其余8类证据不足,原因包括干预措施显示无效果、效果甚微或结果不一;对意识和有效性的报告有限;研究数量少;或研究设计薄弱。没有干预措施报告对结果有平均负面影响。
关于在餐馆促进健康饮食的有效社区策略的证据有限,特别是对于农村地区的干预措施。为了扩大证据基础,应采用稳健的研究设计、标准化的评估方法以及销售、行为和健康结果的测量方法进行更多研究。