Kasteng Frida, Settumba Stella, Källander Karin, Vassall Anna
Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Health Economics and Systems Analysis Group, London, UK,
Malaria Consortium Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Mar;31(2):205-16. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv042. Epub 2015 May 22.
Community health worker (CHW) programmes are currently being scaled-up in sub-Saharan Africa to improve access to healthcare. CHWs are often volunteers; from an economic perspective, this raises considerations whether reliance on an unpaid workforce is sustainable and how to appropriately cost and value the work of CHWs. Both these questions can be informed by an understanding of CHWs' workload, their opportunity costs of time and the perceived benefits of being a CHW. However, to date few studies have fully explored the methodological challenges in valuing CHW time. We examined the costs and benefits of volunteering in a sample of 45 CHWs providing integrated community case management of common childhood illnesses in rural Uganda in February 2012 using different methods. We assessed the value of CHW time using the minimum public sector salary rate and a CHW-elicited replacement wage, as well as the opportunity cost of time based on CHW-estimated annual income and alternative work opportunities, respectively. Reported monthly CHW workload, a median of 19.3 h (range 2.5-57), was valued at USD 6.9 (range 0.9-20.4) per month from the perspective of the healthcare system (applicable replacement wage) and at a median of USD 4.1 (range 0.4-169) from the perspective of the CHWs (individual opportunity cost of time). In a discrete choice experiment on preferred work characteristics, remuneration and community appreciation dominated. We find that volunteering CHWs value the opportunity to make a social contribution, but the decision to volunteer is also influenced by anticipated future rewards. Care must be taken by those costing and designing CHW programmes to acknowledge the opportunity cost of CHWs at the margin and over the long term. Failure to properly consider these issues may lead to cost estimations below the amount necessary to scale up and sustain programmes.
目前,撒哈拉以南非洲地区正在扩大社区卫生工作者(CHW)项目,以改善医疗服务的可及性。社区卫生工作者通常是志愿者;从经济角度来看,这引发了人们对依赖无偿劳动力是否可持续以及如何合理计算社区卫生工作者的工作成本和价值的思考。了解社区卫生工作者的工作量、他们的时间机会成本以及成为社区卫生工作者的预期收益,有助于回答这两个问题。然而,迄今为止,很少有研究全面探讨评估社区卫生工作者时间价值时所面临的方法学挑战。2012年2月,我们采用不同方法,对乌干达农村地区45名提供常见儿童疾病综合社区病例管理的社区卫生工作者进行抽样调查,研究了志愿服务的成本和收益。我们分别使用公共部门最低工资率和社区卫生工作者自行确定的替代工资来评估社区卫生工作者时间的价值,同时还根据社区卫生工作者估计的年收入和其他工作机会来计算时间机会成本。从医疗系统的角度(适用替代工资)来看,社区卫生工作者每月报告的工作量中位数为19.3小时(范围为2.5 - 57小时),每月价值6.9美元(范围为0.9 - 20.4美元);从社区卫生工作者自身的角度(个人时间机会成本)来看,中位数为4.1美元(范围为0.4 - 169美元)。在一项关于偏好工作特征的离散选择实验中,薪酬和社区认可最为重要。我们发现,志愿参与的社区卫生工作者重视做出社会贡献的机会,但志愿服务的决定也受到预期未来回报的影响。在计算成本和设计社区卫生工作者项目时,必须考虑到社区卫生工作者在边际和长期的机会成本。如果未能妥善考虑这些问题,可能会导致成本估计低于扩大和维持项目所需的金额。