Demb H B, Weintraub A G
Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1989 Dec;10(6):292-8.
Twelve of eighteen preschool children, previously diagnosed as having an atypical pervasive developmental disorder (APDD), using the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-III) of the American Psychiatric Association, were followed up 5 years later. The follow-up consisted of a pediatric neurodevelopmental evaluation and the administration of the Personality Inventory for Children (PIC), and a scale derived from the criteria for an autistic disorder (AD) in the revised third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-III-R). The children continued to have significant emotional, social, and cognitive problems at follow-up. Almost all required some form of therapeutic intervention, and many received multiple interventions. A broader range of symptoms (including positive symptoms of schizophrenia and signs of affective and anxiety disorders) were noted. A comparison of DSM-III and DSM-III-R criteria for autism with this population revealed a lack of reliability in diagnoses between systems, both with respect to the more specific diagnosis ("autism") and the less specific atypical diagnoses. The authors discuss the implications of these findings with respect to the interpretation of future follow-up studies of autistic and atypical children.
18名曾被按照美国精神病学会《诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)诊断为非典型广泛性发育障碍(APDD)的学龄前儿童,在5年后接受了随访。随访包括儿科神经发育评估、儿童个性问卷(PIC)的施测,以及根据《诊断与统计手册》修订第三版(DSM - III - R)中自闭症障碍(AD)标准衍生出的一个量表。随访时这些儿童仍存在显著的情绪、社交和认知问题。几乎所有人都需要某种形式的治疗干预,许多人接受了多种干预。还注意到了更广泛的症状(包括精神分裂症的阳性症状以及情感和焦虑障碍的体征)。将该人群的DSM - III和DSM - III - R自闭症标准进行比较后发现,两个系统在诊断方面缺乏可靠性,无论是对于更具体的诊断(“自闭症”)还是不太具体的非典型诊断。作者讨论了这些发现对于自闭症和非典型儿童未来随访研究解释的意义。