Brubaker Linda, Wolfe Alan J
Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Urology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;213(5):644-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.032. Epub 2015 May 21.
Emerging evidence challenges the long-held paradigm that the healthy bladder is sterile. These discoveries may provide new opportunities to address important women's health conditions, which include preterm labor and delivery, urinary tract infections, and common forms of urinary incontinence. Traditional tools for urinary bacterial assessment, which includes urinary dipsticks and standard urine cultures, have significant limitations that restrict the information that is available to clinicians. For example, the standard urine culture does not detect slow-growing bacteria that die in the presence of oxygen. Two new, complementary tools, however, can detect these and other organisms, which permits a more complete characterization of bacterial communities within the female bladder. Obstetrician-gynecologists should become familiar with these new approaches (expanded quantitative urine culture and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing) that can detect previously unrecognized organisms. These advances are making it possible to answer previously intractable scientific and clinical questions. Traditional nomenclature used to describe the bacterial status in the bladder is quite dated and unsuited for the emerging information about the bacterial milieu of the female urinary tract. In the context of the sterile bladder paradigm, clinicians have learned about "uropathogens," "asymptomatic bacteriuria," and "urinary tract infection." Given that the lower urinary tract is not sterile, these terms should be reevaluated. Clinicians can already benefit from the emerging knowledge regarding urinary organisms that have previously gone undetected or unappreciated. For example, in some subpopulations of women with urinary symptoms, existing data suggest that the urinary bacterial community may be associated with women's health conditions of interest. This Clinical Opinion highlights the inadequacies of the current tools for urinary bacterial assessment, describes the new assessment tools, explains the current interpretation of the resulting data, and proposes potential clinical uses and relevance. A new world is opening to our view that will give us the opportunity to better understand urinary bacteria and the bladder in which they live. This new knowledge has significant potential to improve patient care in obstetrics and gynecology.
新出现的证据对长期以来认为健康膀胱是无菌的这一范式提出了挑战。这些发现可能为解决重要的女性健康问题提供新机会,这些问题包括早产和分娩、尿路感染以及常见形式的尿失禁。用于尿液细菌评估的传统工具,包括尿试纸和标准尿培养,存在重大局限性,限制了临床医生可获得的信息。例如,标准尿培养无法检测出在有氧环境中会死亡的生长缓慢的细菌。然而,两种新的互补工具可以检测到这些及其他微生物,从而能够更全面地描述女性膀胱内的细菌群落。妇产科医生应该熟悉这些能够检测出先前未被识别的微生物的新方法(扩展定量尿培养和16S核糖体RNA基因测序)。这些进展使得回答以前难以解决的科学和临床问题成为可能。用于描述膀胱细菌状态的传统术语相当陈旧,不适合关于女性尿道细菌环境的新出现的信息。在无菌膀胱范式的背景下,临床医生了解了“尿路病原体”“无症状菌尿”和“尿路感染”。鉴于下尿路并非无菌,这些术语应该重新评估。临床医生已经可以从关于先前未被检测到或未被重视的尿液微生物的新认识中受益。例如,在一些有泌尿系统症状的女性亚群体中,现有数据表明尿液细菌群落可能与感兴趣的女性健康状况有关。本临床观点强调了当前尿液细菌评估工具的不足之处,描述了新的评估工具,解释了对所得数据的当前解读,并提出了潜在的临床用途和相关性。一个新的世界正在向我们展现,这将使我们有机会更好地了解尿液细菌及其生存的膀胱。这一新知识具有显著潜力,可改善妇产科的患者护理。