Ford James D, Vanderbilt Will, Berrang-Ford Lea
Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada.
Clim Change. 2012;113(2):201-213. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0350-z. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
This essay examines the extent to which we can expect Indigenous Knowledge, understanding, and voices on climate change ('Indigenous content') to be captured in WGII of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), based on an analysis of chapter authorship. Reviewing the publishing history of 309 chapter authors (CAs) to WGII, we document 9 (2.9%) to have published on climate change and Indigenous populations and involved as authors in 6/30 chapters. Drawing upon recent scholarship highlighting how authorship affect structure and content of assessment reports, we argue that, unaddressed, this will affect the extent to which Indigenous content is examined and assessed. While it is too late to alter the structure of AR5, there are opportunities to prioritize the recruitment of contributing authors and reviewers with expertise on Indigenous issues, raise awareness among CAs on the characteristics of impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability faced by Indigenous peoples, and highlight how Indigenous perspectives can help broaden our understanding of climate change and policy interventions.
本文基于对章节作者情况的分析,探讨了在政府间气候变化专门委员会第五次评估报告(AR5)第二工作组中,我们能在多大程度上期待有关气候变化的本土知识、理解和观点(“本土内容”)得到体现。通过回顾第二工作组309位章节作者(CAs)的出版历史,我们记录到其中有9位(2.9%)曾发表过关于气候变化与原住民的文章,并作为作者参与了30个章节中的6个。借鉴近期强调作者身份如何影响评估报告结构和内容的学术研究,我们认为,若不解决这一问题,将会影响对本土内容进行审视和评估的程度。虽然现在改变AR5的结构为时已晚,但仍有机会优先招募具有本土问题专业知识的撰稿作者和审稿人,提高章节作者对原住民所面临的影响、适应和脆弱性特征的认识,并强调本土观点如何有助于拓宽我们对气候变化及政策干预措施的理解。