• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一款新设计的用于麦克纳马拉分析法的头影测量分析软件与海豚软件相比的效能

Efficacy of a Newly Designed Cephalometric Analysis Software for McNamara Analysis in Comparison with Dolphin Software.

作者信息

Nouri Mahtab, Hamidiaval Shadi, Akbarzadeh Baghban Alireza, Basafa Mohammad, Fahim Mohammad

机构信息

Associate Professor of Dentofacial Deformities Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, and Orthodontic Department of School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Resident of Maxillofacial Radiology, Radiology Department, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Jan;12(1):60-9.

PMID:26005455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4436328/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Cephalometric norms of McNamara analysis have been studied in various populations due to their optimal efficiency. Dolphin cephalometric software greatly enhances the conduction of this analysis for orthodontic measurements. However, Dolphin is very expensive and cannot be afforded by many clinicians in developing countries. A suitable alternative software program in Farsi/English will greatly help Farsi speaking clinicians. The present study aimed to develop an affordable Iranian cephalometric analysis software program and compare it with Dolphin, the standard software available on the market for cephalometric analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this diagnostic, descriptive study, 150 lateral cephalograms of normal occlusion individuals were selected in Mashhad and Qazvin, two major cities of Iran mainly populated with Fars ethnicity, the main Iranian ethnic group. After tracing the cephalograms, the McNamara analysis standards were measured both with Dolphin and the new software. The cephalometric software was designed using Microsoft Visual C++ program in Windows XP. Measurements made with the new software were compared with those of Dolphin software on both series of cephalograms. The validity and reliability were tested using intra-class correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Calculations showed a very high correlation between the results of the Iranian cephalometric analysis software and Dolphin. This confirms the validity and optimal efficacy of the newly designed software (ICC 0.570-1.0).

CONCLUSION

According to our results, the newly designed software has acceptable validity and reliability and can be used for orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and assessment of treatment outcome.

摘要

目的

由于麦克纳马拉分析法的测量效率高,因此已在不同人群中对其头影测量标准进行了研究。海豚头影测量软件极大地提高了这种正畸测量分析的操作效率。然而,海豚软件非常昂贵,许多发展中国家的临床医生难以负担。一款合适的波斯语/英语替代软件程序将极大地帮助讲波斯语的临床医生。本研究旨在开发一款价格实惠的伊朗头影测量分析软件程序,并将其与市面上用于头影测量分析的标准软件海豚软件进行比较。

材料与方法

在这项诊断性描述性研究中,从伊朗主要以波斯族(伊朗主要民族)为主的两个大城市马什哈德和加兹温选取了150张正常咬合个体的头颅侧位片。在描绘完头颅侧位片后,分别使用海豚软件和新软件测量麦克纳马拉分析标准。头影测量软件是使用Windows XP系统下的Microsoft Visual C++程序设计的。在这两组头颅侧位片上,将新软件的测量结果与海豚软件的测量结果进行比较。使用组内相关系数测试有效性和可靠性。

结果

计算结果表明,伊朗头影测量分析软件与海豚软件的结果之间具有非常高的相关性。这证实了新设计软件的有效性和最佳效能(组内相关系数为0.570 - 1.0)。

结论

根据我们的结果,新设计的软件具有可接受的有效性和可靠性,可用于正畸诊断、治疗计划制定以及治疗效果评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c1/4436328/ea1779e05634/jod-12-60f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c1/4436328/04a9ffe0b6df/jod-12-60f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c1/4436328/c627d18aa2bc/jod-12-60f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c1/4436328/bc8e2b99230d/jod-12-60f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c1/4436328/ea1779e05634/jod-12-60f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c1/4436328/04a9ffe0b6df/jod-12-60f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c1/4436328/c627d18aa2bc/jod-12-60f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c1/4436328/bc8e2b99230d/jod-12-60f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c1/4436328/ea1779e05634/jod-12-60f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of a Newly Designed Cephalometric Analysis Software for McNamara Analysis in Comparison with Dolphin Software.一款新设计的用于麦克纳马拉分析法的头影测量分析软件与海豚软件相比的效能
J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Jan;12(1):60-9.
2
Reliability and validity of the Digigraph 100 in orthodontic diagnosis.Digigraph 100在正畸诊断中的可靠性和有效性。
J Orofac Orthop. 2001 Mar;62(2):116-32. doi: 10.1007/s00056-001-0028-7.
3
Comparative evaluation of commercially available AI-based cephalometric tracing programs.基于人工智能的头影测量追踪程序的商业应用比较评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):1241. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05032-9.
4
Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.成像板及锥形束计算机断层扫描所得头颅侧位影像的线性测量准确性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):550-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.046.
5
The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.口腔颌面影像学中头影测量的可靠性:锥形束计算机断层扫描与二维数字化头颅侧位片的比较
Indian J Dent Res. 2016 Jul-Aug;27(4):370-377. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.191884.
6
Concurrent validity and reliability of cephalometric analysis using smartphone apps and computer software.使用智能手机应用程序和计算机软件进行头影测量分析的同时效度和可靠性。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Nov;89(6):889-896. doi: 10.2319/021919-124.1. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
7
Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of Cephalometric Measurements Performed on Smartphone-Based Application and Computer-Based Imaging Software: A Comparative Study.基于智能手机应用程序和基于计算机的成像软件进行的头影测量的观察者间和观察者内可靠性:一项比较研究。
Turk J Orthod. 2023 Jun 22;36(2):94-100. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2022.60.
8
Comparison of semi and fully automated artificial intelligence driven softwares and manual system for cephalometric analysis.半自动和全自动人工智能驱动软件与手动系统在头影测量分析中的比较。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02664-3.
9
Picture archiving and communications systems: a study of reliability of orthodontic cephalometric analysis.影像归档和通信系统:正畸头影测量分析可靠性的研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Oct;33(5):537-43. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq116. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
10
Evaluation of the accuracy of fully automatic cephalometric analysis software with artificial intelligence algorithm.评价具有人工智能算法的全自动头影测量分析软件的准确性。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023 Aug;26(3):481-490. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12633. Epub 2023 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Cephalometric Characteristics of Various Ethnic Groups in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚不同种族的头影测量特征
Int J Dent. 2025 May 15;2025:6685596. doi: 10.1155/ijod/6685596. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of semi and fully automated artificial intelligence driven softwares and manual system for cephalometric analysis.半自动和全自动人工智能驱动软件与手动系统在头影测量分析中的比较。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02664-3.
3
Reproducibility of Computerized Cephalometric Analysis Software Compared with Conventional Manual Tracing for Analyzing Skeletal Stability After Orthognathic Surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of an imaging software and manual prediction of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery.正颌外科手术后软组织变化的成像软件预测与手动预测的比较
J Dent (Tehran). 2012 Summer;9(3):178-87. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
2
Reliability of natural head position in orthodontic diagnosis: A cephalometric study.正畸诊断中自然头位的可靠性:一项头影测量研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Apr;3(2):180-3. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.96824.
3
Comparison of two imaging programs in predicting the soft tissue changes with mandibular advancement surgery.
计算机化头影测量分析软件与传统手工描记法在正颌外科术后骨骼稳定性分析中的可重复性比较
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Dec;22(4):833-840. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-02071-7. Epub 2023 Nov 26.
4
Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of Cephalometric Measurements Performed on Smartphone-Based Application and Computer-Based Imaging Software: A Comparative Study.基于智能手机应用程序和基于计算机的成像软件进行的头影测量的观察者间和观察者内可靠性:一项比较研究。
Turk J Orthod. 2023 Jun 22;36(2):94-100. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2022.60.
5
Comparative Evaluation of CephNinja for Android and NemoCeph for Computer for Cephalometric Analysis: A Study to Evaluate the Diagnostic Performance of CephNinja for Cephalometric Analysis.用于头影测量分析的安卓版CephNinja与电脑版NemoCeph的比较评估:一项评估CephNinja用于头影测量分析诊断性能的研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Jun 15;10(3):286-291. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_4_20. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
6
Reliability Assessment of Orthodontic Apps for Cephalometrics.用于头影测量的正畸应用程序的可靠性评估
Turk J Orthod. 2016 Dec;29(4):98-102. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.1618. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
两种成像程序在预测下颌前徙手术软组织变化中的比较。
Orthodontics (Chic.). 2011 Winter;12(4):354-65.
4
Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery.两种软件程序预测双颌正颌手术治疗 III 类错[牙合]患者侧貌变化的对比研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):452.e1-5; discussion 452-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.027.
5
Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.数字放射成像在手动与计算机辅助头影测量分析中的速度、重复性和再现性评估。
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Oct;31(5):523-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp022. Epub 2009 May 14.
6
Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods.头影测量的差异:数字法与手工描绘法的比较
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Jun;31(3):254-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn121. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
7
Software system for calibrating examiners in cephalometric point identification.用于在头影测量点识别中校准检查人员的软件系统。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Mar;135(3):400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.018.
8
A comparison of the reproducibility of manual tracing and on-screen digitization for cephalometric profile variables.头影测量侧位片变量的手工描绘与屏幕数字化再现性比较
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):586-91. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn041. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
9
A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.扫描的头颅侧位片与相应原始X光片的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):340-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.029.
10
Roentgen-cephalometric standards for a Swedish population. A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years.瑞典人群的X线头影测量标准。一项5至31岁的纵向研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2005 Aug;27(4):370-89. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji033.