Manchikanti Laxmaiah, Nampiaparampil Devi E, Manchikanti Kavita N, Falco Frank J E, Singh Vijay, Benyamin Ramsin M, Kaye Alan D, Sehgal Nalini, Soin Amol, Simopoulos Thomas T, Bakshi Sanjay, Gharibo Christopher G, Gilligan Christopher J, Hirsch Joshua A
Medical Director of the Pain Management Center of Paducah, 2831 Lone Oak Road, Paducah, KY, 42003, and Clinical Professor, Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Rehabilitation Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Surg Neurol Int. 2015 May 7;6(Suppl 4):S194-235. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.156598. eCollection 2015.
The efficacy of epidural and facet joint injections has been assessed utilizing multiple solutions including saline, local anesthetic, steroids, and others. The responses to these various solutions have been variable and have not been systematically assessed with long-term follow-ups.
Randomized trials utilizing a true active control design were included. The primary outcome measure was pain relief and the secondary outcome measure was functional improvement. The quality of each individual article was assessed by Cochrane review criteria, as well as the criteria developed by the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) for assessing interventional techniques. An evidence analysis was conducted based on the qualitative level of evidence (Level I to IV).
A total of 31 trials met the inclusion criteria. There was Level I evidence that local anesthetic with steroids was effective in managing chronic spinal pain based on multiple high-quality randomized controlled trials. The evidence also showed that local anesthetic with steroids and local anesthetic alone were equally effective except in disc herniation, where the superiority of local anesthetic with steroids was demonstrated over local anesthetic alone.
This systematic review showed equal efficacy for local anesthetic with steroids and local anesthetic alone in multiple spinal conditions except for disc herniation where the superiority of local anesthetic with steroids was seen over local anesthetic alone.
已使用包括生理盐水、局部麻醉剂、类固醇等多种溶液评估了硬膜外注射和小关节注射的疗效。对这些不同溶液的反应各不相同,且尚未通过长期随访进行系统评估。
纳入采用真正活性对照设计的随机试验。主要结局指标为疼痛缓解,次要结局指标为功能改善。每篇文章的质量根据Cochrane综述标准以及美国介入性疼痛医师协会(ASIPP)制定的评估介入技术的标准进行评估。基于证据的定性水平(I级至IV级)进行证据分析。
共有31项试验符合纳入标准。基于多项高质量随机对照试验,有I级证据表明局部麻醉剂加类固醇对治疗慢性脊柱疼痛有效。证据还表明,局部麻醉剂加类固醇与单纯局部麻醉剂同样有效,但在椎间盘突出症中,局部麻醉剂加类固醇优于单纯局部麻醉剂。
本系统评价表明,在多种脊柱疾病中,局部麻醉剂加类固醇与单纯局部麻醉剂疗效相当,但在椎间盘突出症中,局部麻醉剂加类固醇优于单纯局部麻醉剂。