Khowaja Asif R, Mitton Craig, Bryan Stirling, Magee Laura A, Bhutta Zulfiqar A, von Dadelszen Peter
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; and Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Implement Sci. 2015 May 26;10:76. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0266-5.
Globally, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, particularly pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, are the leading cause of maternal and neonatal mortality, and impose substantial burdens on the families of pregnant women, their communities, and healthcare systems. The Community Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) Trial evaluates a package of care applied at both community and primary health centres to reduce maternal and perinatal disabilities and deaths resulting from the failure to identify and manage pre-eclampsia at the community level. Economic evaluation of health interventions can play a pivotal role in priority setting and inform policy decisions for scale-up. At present, there is a paucity of published literature on the methodology of economic evaluation of large, multi-country, community-based interventions in the area of maternal and perinatal health. This study protocol describes the application of methodology for economic evaluation of the CLIP in South Asia and Africa.
A mixed-design approach i.e. cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and qualitative thematic analysis will be used alongside the trial to prospectively evaluate the economic impact of CLIP from a societal perspective. Data on health resource utilization, costs, and pregnancy outcomes will be collected through structured questionnaires embedded into the pregnancy surveillance, cross-sectional survey and budgetary reviews. Qualitative data will be collected through focus groups (FGs) with pregnant women, household male-decision makers, care providers, and district level health decision makers. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated for healthcare system and societal perspectives, taking into account the country-specific model inputs (costs and outcome) from the CLIP Trial. Emerging themes from FGs will inform the design of the model, and help to interpret findings of the CEA.
The World Health Organization (WHO) strongly recommends cost-effective interventions as a key aspect of achieving Millennium Development Goal (MDG)-5 (i.e. 75 % reduction in maternal mortality from 1990 levels by 2015). To date, most cost-effectiveness studies in this field have focused specifically on the diagnostic and clinical management of pre-eclampsia, yet rarely on community-based interventions in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs). This study protocol will be of interest to public health scientists and health economists undertaking community-based trials in the area of maternal and perinatal health, particularly in LMICs.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01911494.
在全球范围内,妊娠高血压疾病,尤其是子痫前期和子痫,是孕产妇和新生儿死亡的主要原因,给孕妇家庭、其所在社区及医疗保健系统带来了沉重负担。子痫前期社区层面干预措施(CLIP)试验评估了在社区和初级卫生保健中心实施的一套护理措施,以减少因在社区层面未能识别和管理子痫前期而导致的孕产妇和围产儿残疾及死亡。卫生干预措施的经济评估在确定优先事项及为扩大规模的政策决策提供信息方面可发挥关键作用。目前,关于孕产妇和围产儿健康领域大型、多国、基于社区的干预措施经济评估方法的已发表文献较少。本研究方案描述了CLIP在南亚和非洲经济评估方法的应用。
将采用混合设计方法,即成本效益分析(CEA)和定性主题分析,与该试验一起前瞻性地从社会角度评估CLIP的经济影响。关于卫生资源利用、成本和妊娠结局的数据将通过纳入妊娠监测、横断面调查和预算审查的结构化问卷收集。定性数据将通过与孕妇、家庭男性决策者、护理提供者和地区级卫生决策者进行焦点小组访谈收集。将从医疗保健系统和社会角度计算增量成本效益比,同时考虑CLIP试验中特定国家的模型输入(成本和结局)。焦点小组访谈中出现的新主题将为模型设计提供信息,并有助于解释成本效益分析的结果。
世界卫生组织(WHO)强烈建议将具有成本效益的干预措施作为实现千年发展目标(MDG)-5(即到2015年将孕产妇死亡率在1990年水平基础上降低75%)的一个关键方面。迄今为止,该领域的大多数成本效益研究都特别关注子痫前期的诊断和临床管理,但很少关注低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)基于社区的干预措施。本研究方案将引起在孕产妇和围产儿健康领域,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家开展基于社区试验的公共卫生科学家和卫生经济学家的兴趣。
ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01911494。