Briggs Gerald G, Polifka Janine E, Wisner Katherine L, Gervais Eric, Miller Richard K, Berard Anick, Koren Gideon, Forinash Alicia, Towers Craig V
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Pharmacotherapy, Washington State University, Spokane, WA.
University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;213(6):810-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.047. Epub 2015 May 23.
Relatively few drugs, especially those recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, have published human pregnancy experience. Although all drugs contain animal reproduction data, these are usually not predictive of human risk. Clinical trials in pregnant women are rarely conducted because of ethical and legal concerns, and it may be many years before sufficient observational data are collected to guide clinical treatment decisions. Because many of these drugs will be used in pregnancy, human data are needed shortly after the drugs come to the market. Lack of human data leads to uncertainty over whether a drug can be safely prescribed for a pregnant patient. Unless there are compelling scientific and ethical reasons to exclude them, pregnant women should be included in phase IV clinical trials (postmarketing studies to obtain additional information, including the risks, benefits, and optimal use of a drug). This paper examines how physicians currently counsel pregnant women when there are no human data and proposes an alternative method in which knowledge regarding risks associated with the use of drugs during pregnancy can be enhanced in a clinical trial setting.
相对而言,已发表人类妊娠用药经验的药物较少,尤其是那些最近获得美国食品药品监督管理局批准的药物。尽管所有药物都有动物生殖数据,但这些数据通常无法预测人类风险。由于伦理和法律方面的担忧,很少进行孕妇临床试验,而且可能需要很多年才能收集到足够的观察数据来指导临床治疗决策。因为这些药物中的许多都会在孕期使用,所以在药物上市后不久就需要人类数据。缺乏人类数据导致对于能否为孕妇安全开具某种药物存在不确定性。除非有令人信服的科学和伦理理由将她们排除在外,否则孕妇应纳入IV期临床试验(上市后研究以获取更多信息,包括药物的风险、益处和最佳用法)。本文探讨了在没有人类数据的情况下医生目前如何为孕妇提供咨询,并提出了一种替代方法,即在临床试验环境中增强有关孕期用药风险的知识。