Craig Jennifer, Tomlinson Carey, Stevens Kristin, Kotagal Kiran, Fornadley Judith, Jacobson Barbara, Garrett C Gaelyn, Francis David O
Vanderbilt Voice Center, 1215 21st Ave South, 7302 Medical Center East, South Tower, Nashville, TN 37212, United States.
Vanderbilt Dayani Center, Nashville, TN 37212, United States.
J Commun Disord. 2015 Nov-Dec;58:169-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 May 19.
This study investigated the role of a specialized physical therapy program for muscle tension dysphonia patients as an adjunct to standard of care voice therapy.
Retrospective Cohort Study Methods Adult MTD patients seen between 2007 and 2012 were identified from the clinical database. They were prescribed voice therapy and, if concomitant neck pain, adjunctive physical therapy. In a pragmatic observational cohort design, patients underwent one of four potential treatment approaches: voice therapy alone (VT), voice therapy and physical therapy (VT+PT), physical therapy alone (PT), or incomplete/no treatment. Voice handicap outcomes were compared between treatment approaches.
Of 153 patients meeting criteria (Median age 48 years, 68% female, and 30% had fibromyalgia, chronic pain, chronic fatigue, depression, and/or anxiety), there was a similar distribution of patients with moderate or severe pre-treatment VHI scores across treatment groups (VT 45.5%, VT+PT 43.8%, PT 50%, no treatment 59.1%; p=0.45). Patients treated with VT alone had significantly greater median improvement in VHI than those not treated: 10-point vs. 2-point (p=0.02). Interestingly, median VHI improvement in patients with baseline moderate-severe VHI scores was no different between VT (10), VT+PT (8) and PT alone (10; p=0.99).
Findings show voice therapy to be an effective approach to treating MTD. Importantly, other treatment modalities incorporating physical therapy had a similar, albeit not significant, improvement in VHI. This preliminary study suggests that physical therapy techniques may have a role in the treatment of a subset of MTD patients. Larger, comparative studies are needed to better characterize the role of physical therapy in this population.
The reader will describe symptoms associated with muscle tension dysphonia and current treatment. The reader will describe the systematic adjunctive physical therapy approach and understand the rationale to consider incorporation of physical therapy into the current treatment regimen.
本研究调查了针对肌肉紧张性发声障碍患者的专门物理治疗方案作为标准护理嗓音治疗辅助手段的作用。
回顾性队列研究方法 从临床数据库中识别出2007年至2012年间就诊的成年肌肉紧张性发声障碍患者。他们接受了嗓音治疗,如果伴有颈部疼痛,则接受辅助物理治疗。在一项实用的观察性队列设计中,患者接受了四种潜在治疗方法之一:单独嗓音治疗(VT)、嗓音治疗和物理治疗(VT+PT)、单独物理治疗(PT)或不完全治疗/未治疗。比较了不同治疗方法之间的嗓音障碍结果。
在153名符合标准的患者中(中位年龄48岁,68%为女性,30%患有纤维肌痛、慢性疼痛、慢性疲劳、抑郁和/或焦虑),各治疗组中治疗前嗓音障碍指数(VHI)评分为中度或重度的患者分布相似(VT组45.5%,VT+PT组43.8%,PT组50%,未治疗组59.1%;p=0.45)。单独接受VT治疗的患者VHI的中位改善程度显著高于未接受治疗的患者:10分对2分(p=0.02)。有趣的是,基线VHI评分为中度至重度的患者中,VT组(10分)、VT+PT组(8分)和单独PT组(10分)的VHI中位改善程度无差异(p=0.99)。
研究结果表明嗓音治疗是治疗肌肉紧张性发声障碍的有效方法。重要的是,其他包含物理治疗的治疗方式在VHI方面有类似的改善,尽管不显著。这项初步研究表明物理治疗技术可能在一部分肌肉紧张性发声障碍患者的治疗中发挥作用。需要进行更大规模的比较研究,以更好地描述物理治疗在该人群中的作用。
读者将描述与肌肉紧张性发声障碍相关的症状和当前治疗方法。读者将描述系统性辅助物理治疗方法,并理解将物理治疗纳入当前治疗方案的基本原理。