Panchasara A, Singh A, Mandavia D, Jha S, Tripathi C
Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Bhavnagar-364001, Gujarat, India;
Department of Otorhinolaryngolgy, Sir Takhtasinhji General Hospital & Government Medical College, Bhavnagar-364001, Gujarat, India.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015 Feb;35(1):39-44.
The role of corticosteroid in patients of chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is unknown. In the present study, the efficacy and safety of ofloxacin alone (OA) and the ofloxacin + dexamethasone combination (ODC) is compared by studying clinical cure rates and adverse drug reactions in patients with CSOM. After prior permission from the Institutional Review Board and written informed consent from patients, pre-treatment clinical assessment and bacteriology of the middle ear discharge were done. The middle ear was categorised into active, mucoid or inactive according to the type of discharge. Grades of otorrhoea and size of tympanic membrane perforation were noted. CSOM with organisms sensitive to ofloxacin were treated either with OA or ODC eardrops for a period of 15 days. Post-treatment clinical cure (when grade of otorrhoea become 0) was recorded on the 5(th), 10(th) and 15(th) days and bacteriological assessment was recorded at the last visit. All parameters were analysed using Fisher's exact test. A total 110 patients were randomised. The most common microorganism associated with CSOM was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (45.45 %). Clinical improvement was seen in 84.61% and 86.79% of cases, but bacteriological improvement in only 82.69% and 77.35% of cases treated with OA and ODC, respectively. Shift of middle ear discharge from active to inactive was noted in 71.15% and 64.15% patients by the 10th day in the OA and ODC groups, respectively. As there was no difference in clinical or bacteriological improvement, it may be unnecessary to combine steroids with topical antibiotic preparations for management of CSOM.
皮质类固醇在慢性化脓性中耳炎(CSOM)患者中的作用尚不清楚。在本研究中,通过研究CSOM患者的临床治愈率和药物不良反应,比较了单用氧氟沙星(OA)和氧氟沙星+地塞米松联合用药(ODC)的疗效和安全性。在获得机构审查委员会的事先许可和患者的书面知情同意后,进行了治疗前的临床评估和中耳分泌物的细菌学检查。根据分泌物类型,将中耳分为活动型、黏液型或非活动型。记录耳漏程度和鼓膜穿孔大小。对氧氟沙星敏感菌所致的CSOM患者,用OA或ODC滴耳液治疗15天。在第5、10和15天记录治疗后的临床治愈情况(耳漏程度变为0时),并在最后一次就诊时记录细菌学评估结果。所有参数均采用Fisher精确检验进行分析。总共110例患者被随机分组。与CSOM相关的最常见微生物是铜绿假单胞菌(45.45%)。OA组和ODC组分别有84.61%和86.79%的病例出现临床改善,但细菌学改善分别仅为82.69%和77.35%。OA组和ODC组分别在第10天时,有71.15%和64.15%的患者中耳分泌物从活动型转变为非活动型。由于临床或细菌学改善无差异,对于CSOM的治疗,将类固醇与局部抗生素制剂联合使用可能没有必要。