• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国学术性医疗中心频繁收治患者的特征。

The characteristics of patients frequently admitted to academic medical centers in the United States.

作者信息

Szekendi Marilyn K, Williams Mark V, Carrier Danielle, Hensley Laurie, Thomas Stephen, Cerese Julie

机构信息

Performance Improvement, University HealthSystem Consortium, Chicago, Illinois.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2015 Sep;10(9):563-8. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2375. Epub 2015 May 26.

DOI:10.1002/jhm.2375
PMID:26018340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5032986/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recent intense attention to hospital readmissions and their implications for quality, safety, and reimbursement necessitates understanding specific subsets of readmitted patients. Frequently admitted patients, defined as patients who are admitted 5 or more times within 1 year, may have some distinguishing characteristics that require novel solutions.

METHODS

A comprehensive administrative database (University HealthSystem Consortium's Clinical Data Base/Resource Manager) was analyzed to identify demographic, social, and clinical characteristics of frequently admitted patients in 101 US academic medical centers.

RESULTS

We studied 28,291 frequently admitted patients with 180,185 admissions over a 1-year period (2011-2012). These patients comprise 1.6% of all patients, but account for 8% of all admissions and 7% of direct costs. Their admissions are driven by multiple chronic conditions; compared to other hospitalized patients, they have significantly more comorbidities (an average of 7.1 vs 2.5), and 84% of their admissions are to medical services. A minority, but significantly more than other patients, have comorbidities of psychosis or substance abuse. Moreover, although they are slightly more likely than other patients to be on Medicaid or to be uninsured (27.6% vs 21.6%), nearly three-quarters have private or Medicare coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who are frequently admitted to US academic medical centers are likely to have multiple complex chronic conditions and may have behavioral comorbidities that mediate their health behaviors, resulting in acute episodes requiring hospitalization. This information can be used to identify solutions for preventing repeat hospitalization for this small group of patients who consume a highly disproportionate share of healthcare resources.

摘要

背景

近期对医院再入院情况及其对医疗质量、安全和报销的影响给予了高度关注,这就需要了解再入院患者的特定亚组情况。频繁入院患者,定义为在1年内入院5次或更多次的患者,可能具有一些需要新解决方案的独特特征。

方法

分析了一个综合管理数据库(大学卫生系统联盟的临床数据库/资源管理器),以确定美国101家学术医疗中心频繁入院患者的人口统计学、社会和临床特征。

结果

我们研究了28291名频繁入院患者,在1年期间(2011 - 2012年)共有180185次入院。这些患者占所有患者的1.6%,但占所有入院次数的8%和直接费用的7%。他们的入院是由多种慢性疾病驱动的;与其他住院患者相比,他们有明显更多的合并症(平均7.1种 vs 2.5种),并且他们84%的入院是接受医疗服务。少数患者患有精神病或药物滥用合并症,但比其他患者明显更多。此外,尽管他们比其他患者更有可能参加医疗补助计划或未参保(27.6% vs 21.6%),但近四分之三的患者有私人保险或医疗保险。

结论

美国学术医疗中心的频繁入院患者可能患有多种复杂的慢性疾病,并且可能有行为合并症影响他们的健康行为,导致需要住院治疗的急性发作。这些信息可用于为这一小部分消耗了极高比例医疗资源的患者确定预防再次住院的解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcd7/5032986/934a3620530a/JHM-10-563-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcd7/5032986/e8970722836c/JHM-10-563-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcd7/5032986/934a3620530a/JHM-10-563-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcd7/5032986/e8970722836c/JHM-10-563-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcd7/5032986/934a3620530a/JHM-10-563-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The characteristics of patients frequently admitted to academic medical centers in the United States.美国学术性医疗中心频繁收治患者的特征。
J Hosp Med. 2015 Sep;10(9):563-8. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2375. Epub 2015 May 26.
2
Medicaid-insured and uninsured were more likely to have diabetes emergency/urgent admissions.医疗补助保险参保者和未参保者更有可能因糖尿病进行急诊/紧急入院治疗。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 May 1;21(5):e312-9.
3
Regional trends and the impact of various patient and hospital factors on outcomes and costs of hospitalization between academic and nonacademic centers after deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease: a United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis from 2006 to 2010.2006 年至 2010 年美国全国住院患者样本分析:深脑刺激手术后帕金森病患者在学术和非学术中心的结局和住院费用的区域趋势及其受患者和医院因素的影响。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Nov;35(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.FOCUS13295.
4
Domestic Travel and Regional Migration for Parathyroid Surgery Among Patients Receiving Care at Academic Medical Centers in the United States, 2012-2014.2012-2014 年美国学术医疗中心就诊的甲状旁腺手术患者的国内旅行和区域迁移情况。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jul 1;142(7):641-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.0509.
5
Fragmentation of care for frequently hospitalized urban residents.城市中频繁住院居民的医疗服务碎片化。
Med Care. 2006 Jun;44(6):560-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000215811.68308.ae.
6
Predictors of psychiatric boarding in the emergency department.急诊科精神科住院的预测因素。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;16(1):71-5. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.10.23011. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
7
Health disparities and stroke: the influence of insurance status on the prevalence of patient safety indicators and hospital-acquired conditions.健康差异与中风:保险状况对患者安全指标患病率及医院获得性疾病的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Apr;122(4):870-5. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS14646. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
8
Characterizing pulmonary hypertension-related hospitalization costs among Medicare Advantage or commercially insured patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a retrospective database study.对医疗保险优势计划参保者或商业保险覆盖的肺动脉高压患者的肺动脉高压相关住院费用进行特征分析:一项回顾性数据库研究。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Jan;21(3 Suppl):s47-58.
9
Variations in 30-day hospital readmission rates across primary care clinics within a tertiary referral center.三级转诊中心内各初级保健诊所30天医院再入院率的差异。
J Hosp Med. 2014 Nov;9(11):688-94. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2243. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
10
Trauma patient readmissions: Why do they come back for more?创伤患者再入院:他们为何再次入院?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Nov;79(5):717-24; discussion 724-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000844.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of methods for identifying multimorbidity patterns among people with opioid use disorder: A retrospective single-cohort study.阿片类物质使用障碍患者中多重疾病模式识别方法的比较分析:一项回顾性单队列研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 12;20(6):e0324548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324548. eCollection 2025.
2
Sleeve gastrectomy with same-day discharge: a propensity score-matched analysis of independent predictors of complication.当日出院的袖状胃切除术:并发症独立预测因素的倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11837-8.
3
Validation of ICD-10 Consensus Code Set for Cirrhosis Detection Using Electronic Health Records in an Asian Population.

本文引用的文献

1
Dispelling an urban legend: frequent emergency department users have substantial burden of disease.破除都市传说:频繁使用急诊的患者有大量未确诊的疾病。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Dec;32(12):2099-108. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1276.
2
What's cost got to do with it? Association between hospital costs and frequency of admissions among "high users" of hospital care.费用与此有何关系?医院护理“高使用者”的住院费用与住院频率之间的关联。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Dec;8(12):665-71. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2096. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
3
Readmission reduction takes center stage.
在亚洲人群中使用电子健康记录验证用于肝硬化检测的ICD - 10共识编码集
JGH Open. 2025 May 6;9(5):e70156. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70156. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Does a Community Care programme reach a high health need population and high users of acute care hospital services in Melbourne, Australia? An observational cohort study.澳大利亚墨尔本的社区关怀计划是否能覆盖到高健康需求人群和高急性护理医院服务使用者?一项观察性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 26;13(9):e077195. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077195.
5
Impact of Medication-Based Treatment on Health Care Utilization Among Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder.药物治疗对阿片类药物使用障碍患者医疗保健利用的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Dec 1;74(12):1227-1233. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220549. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
6
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning scoring tool for estimating time to emergency readmissions.用于估计急诊再入院时间的可解释机器学习评分工具的开发与验证
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Mar 6;45:101315. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101315. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Super-High-Utilizer Patients in an Urban Academic Emergency Department: Characteristics, Early Identification, and Impact of Strategic Care Management Interventions.城市学术性急诊科的超高利用率患者:特征、早期识别及战略护理管理干预的影响
Health Soc Work. 2022 Jan 31;47(1):68-71. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hlab041.
8
Multimorbidity and Inpatient Utilization Among Older Adults with Opioid Use Disorder in New York City.纽约市老年阿片类药物使用障碍患者的共病与住院利用情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(7):1634-1640. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07130-8. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
9
Early chemoprophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis does not increase the risk of hematoma expansion in patients presenting with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.对于自发性脑出血患者,早期进行深静脉血栓化学预防不会增加血肿扩大的风险。
Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Jun 14;12:277. doi: 10.25259/SNI_100_2021. eCollection 2021.
10
Patients' perceptions of frequent hospital admissions: a qualitative interview study with older people above 65 years of age.患者对频繁住院的看法:一项对 65 岁以上老年人的定性访谈研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Sep 7;20(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01748-9.
减少再入院率成为核心问题。
Hosp Case Manag. 2013 Sep;21(9):117-20.
4
The influence of a postdischarge intervention on reducing hospital readmissions in a Medicare population.出院后干预对减少 Medicare 人群住院再入院的影响。
Popul Health Manag. 2013 Oct;16(5):310-6. doi: 10.1089/pop.2012.0084. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
5
An intervention to improve care and reduce costs for high-risk patients with frequent hospital admissions: a pilot study.改善频繁住院的高危患者的护理并降低成本的干预措施:一项试点研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 13;11:270. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-270.
6
Effectiveness of interventions targeting frequent users of emergency departments: a systematic review.干预措施针对急诊频繁使用者的效果:系统评价。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1):41-52.e42. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.007.
7
Frequent users of emergency departments: the myths, the data, and the policy implications.急诊科的高频使用者:误区、数据和政策含义。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;56(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.01.032. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
8
A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data.将埃利克斯豪泽共病测量法修改为一种使用行政数据的医院死亡点数系统。
Med Care. 2009 Jun;47(6):626-33. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819432e5.
9
Development and validation of a model for predicting emergency admissions over the next year (PEONY): a UK historical cohort study.预测未来一年急诊入院情况的模型(PEONY)的开发与验证:一项英国历史队列研究。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jul 14;168(13):1416-22. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1416.
10
A comparison of frequent and infrequent visitors to an urban emergency department.城市急诊科频繁就诊者与非频繁就诊者的比较。
J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):115-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.09.042. Epub 2008 May 7.