Liao Xiao-Min, Nong Gao-Hui, Chen Mei-Zu, Huang Xue-Ping, Cong Yun-Yan, Huang Yi-Ying, Wu Bai-He, Wei Jin-Qi
Xiao-Min Liao, Yi-Ying Huang, Bai-He Wu, Jin-Qi Wei, Department of Gastroenterology, the 5 Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong Province, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 28;21(20):6310-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6310.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified sequential therapy and to compare modified sequential therapy with standard quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication.
In total, 200 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with H. pylori-infected chronic gastritis by electronic endoscopy and rapid urease testing from December 2012 to October 2013 were enrolled in this study. The patients had not previously received H. pylori eradication treatment, and were randomized into two groups. The patients in Group A (n = 101) were treated with ilaprazole + bismuth potassium citrate + amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium + levofloxacin, and the patients in Group B (n = 99) were administered a modified sequential therapy composed of ilaprazole at 5 mg bid and amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium at 914 mg for the first five days followed by ilaprazole at 5 mg bid, furazolidone at 100 mg bid and levofloxacin at 500 mg qid for the next five days. Four to six weeks after the end of treatment, a 14C-urea breath test was performed for all the subjects to confirm the eradication of H. pylori. The intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were determined.
A total of 190 of the 200 patients completed the study. All 200 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, whereas 190 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the rates of H. pylori eradication in Groups A and B were 85.15% (86/101) and 81.82% (81/99), respectively. In the per-protocol analysis, the H. pylori eradication rates in Groups A and B were 88.66% (86/97) and 87.09% (81/93), respectively. No significant difference was observed (χ(2) = 0.109, P = 0.741) in the eradication rate between Groups A and B. The rates of adverse effects observed in the groups were similar at 6.19% (6/97) for Group A and 7.53% (7/93) for Group B (P > 0.05). No mortality or major morbidities were observed in any of the patients. Symptomatic improvements in the presentation of stomachache, acid regurgitation, and burning sensation were not significantly different between the two groups.
Ilaprazole-based 10-d standard quadruple therapy does not offer an incremental benefit over modified sequential therapy for the treatment of H. pylori infection, as both treatment regimens appear to be effective, safe, and well-tolerated as initial treatment options.
评估改良序贯疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)感染的疗效和安全性,并将改良序贯疗法与标准四联疗法进行比较,以确定哪种疗法更有助于根除幽门螺杆菌。
选取2012年12月至2013年10月期间,经电子内镜及快速尿素酶试验确诊为H. pylori感染的慢性胃炎患者200例。所有患者此前均未接受过H. pylori根除治疗,并随机分为两组。A组(n = 101)采用艾普拉唑+枸橼酸铋钾+阿莫西林克拉维酸钾+左氧氟沙星治疗;B组(n = 99)采用改良序贯疗法,前5天给予5 mg bid艾普拉唑和914 mg阿莫西林克拉维酸钾,后5天给予5 mg bid艾普拉唑、100 mg bid呋喃唑酮和500 mg qid左氧氟沙星。治疗结束4至6周后,对所有受试者进行14C-尿素呼气试验,以确认H. pylori是否被根除。计算意向性分析和符合方案分析的根除率。
200例患者中,190例完成了研究。所有200例患者均纳入意向性分析,190例患者纳入符合方案分析。在意向性分析中,A组和B组的H. pylori根除率分别为85.15%(86/101)和81.82%(81/99)。在符合方案分析中,A组和B组的H. pylori根除率分别为88.66%(86/97)和87.09%(81/93)。两组根除率差异无统计学意义(χ(2) = 0.109,P = 0.741)。两组不良反应发生率相似,A组为6.19%(6/97),B组为7.53%(7/93)(P > 0.05)。所有患者均未出现死亡或严重并发症。两组患者在胃痛、反酸和烧灼感等症状改善方面差异无统计学意义。
对于H. pylori感染的治疗,以艾普拉唑为基础的10天标准四联疗法并不比改良序贯疗法更具优势,两种治疗方案作为初始治疗选择似乎都是有效、安全且耐受性良好的。